Bonn Michael, Eydeler Urte, Barkworth Martin, Rovati Lucio C
Madaus GmbH, Rottapharm Madaus Group, Cologne, Germany.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2009;59(12):651-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296455.
The bioavailability and bioequivalence of two different film coated tablets containing ethinylestradiol (CAS 57-63-6) and chlormadinone acetate (CAS 302-22-7) (Bellissima as test and the respective preparation from the originator as reference) were investigated in 20 healthy female volunteers after oral single-dose administration. The study was performed according to a single-center, randomised, single-dose, 2-way cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 28 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 168 h post-dose, and ethinylestradiol and chlormadinone acetate plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. The observed mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of ethinylestradiol were 124.96 pg/ml (test) and 129.12 pg/ml (reference). In the case of chlormadinone acetate, Cmax averaged 6.9566 ng/ml (test) and 6.6663 ng/m (reference). The geometric means of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of ethinylestradiol were 1292.35 pg/ml x h (test) and 1380.49 pg/ml x h (reference). For chlormadinone acetate, geometric means of AUC(0-infinity) were 53.322 ng/ml x h (test) and 58.111 ng/ml x h (reference). The median of tmax of ethinylestradiol was 1.5 h for both test and reference and the median of tmax of chlormadinone acetate 1.0 h (test) and 1.5 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of ethinylestradiol were 14.96 h (test) and 15.41 h (reference) and of chlormadinone acetate 56.63 h (test) and 56.17 h (reference), respectively. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The point estimator and the 90% confidence intervals for the AUC(0-infinity) ratio (test/reference: 93.72% [86.62%-101.39%]) indicate high similarity of both formulations with respect to the extent of ethinylestradiol exposure. A high degree of similarity was also observed for Cmax of ethinylestradiol, as the point estimator and the 90% confidence interval for the Cmax ratio are 96.18% (90.82%-101.86%). Regarding the AUC(0-infinity) ratio of chlormadinone acetate, the point estimator is 91.60% and the 90% confidence interval 84.08%-99.79%. Furthermore, exchangeability of both formulations is also suggested by the point estimator and 90% confidence of Cmax of this active agent (104.72% [95.76%-114.53%]). Bioequivalence between test and reference formulation was demonstrated since for both ethinylestradiol and chlormadinone acetate all 90% confidence intervals of AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax fall into the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.
在20名健康女性志愿者口服单剂量给药后,对两种含有炔雌醇(CAS 57-63-6)和醋酸氯地孕酮(CAS 302-22-7)的不同薄膜包衣片(以Bellissima作为试验制剂,以原研药的相应制剂作为参比制剂)的生物利用度和生物等效性进行了研究。该研究按照单中心、随机、单剂量、两周期交叉设计进行,洗脱期为28天。在给药后长达168小时采集血样进行药代动力学分析,采用经过验证的液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测定炔雌醇和醋酸氯地孕酮的血浆浓度。观察到炔雌醇的平均最大血浆浓度(Cmax)分别为124.96 pg/ml(试验制剂)和129.12 pg/ml(参比制剂)。对于醋酸氯地孕酮,Cmax平均为6.9566 ng/ml(试验制剂)和6.6όό3 ng/ml(参比制剂)。炔雌醇血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC(0-∞))的几何均值分别为1292.35 pg/ml·h(试验制剂)和1380.49 pg/ml·h(参比制剂)。对于醋酸氯地孕酮,AUC(0-∞)的几何均值分别为53.322 ng/ml·h(试验制剂)和58.111 ng/ml·h(参比制剂)。炔雌醇的tmax中位数在试验制剂和参比制剂中均为1.5小时,醋酸氯地孕酮的tmax中位数分别为1.0小时(试验制剂)和1.5小时(参比制剂)。炔雌醇的血浆消除半衰期(t1/2)分别为14.96小时(试验制剂)和15.41小时(参比制剂),醋酸氯地孕酮的血浆消除半衰期分别为56.63小时(试验制剂)和56.17小时(参比制剂)。通过方差分析(ANOVA)对两个主要目标参数AUC(0-∞)和Cmax进行参数检验。AUC(0-∞)比值(试验制剂/参比制剂:93.72% [86.62%-101.39%])的点估计值和90%置信区间表明,两种制剂在炔雌醇暴露程度方面具有高度相似性。炔雌醇Cmax的点估计值和90%置信区间为96.18%(90.82%-101.86%),也观察到高度相似性。关于醋酸氯地孕酮的AUC(0-∞)比值,点估计值为91.60%,90%置信区间为84.08%-99.79%。此外,该活性成分Cmax的点估计值和90%置信区间(104.72% [95.76%-114.53%])也表明两种制剂具有可替换性。由于炔雌醇和醋酸氯地孕酮的AUC(0-∞)和Cmax的所有90%置信区间均落在普遍接受的80%-125%范围内,因此证明了试验制剂和参比制剂之间的生物等效性。