Division of Clinical and Outcomes Research, Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Kannapolis, North Carolina 287081, USA.
Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.007.
Combination inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy is recommended for patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled by other maintenance therapies and for those with moderate to severe asthma.
This study examined the appropriateness of initiation of ICS/LABA combination therapy based on health care use criteria and the proportions of US patients filling prescriptions for either of 2 available therapies.
This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from commercially insured asthma patients aged 12 to 64 years who initiated combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) or budesonide/ formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BFC) from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2008. Continuously enrolled patients who had not received ICS/LABA therapy during a 12-month preindex period were assigned to the BFC or FSC cohort based on their initial ICS/LABA prescription (index date). Appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA combination therapy was determined based on the risks for asthma exacerbation, high impairment, and previous controller medication use. Specifically, initiation of ICS/LABA therapy was considered appropriate if patients had claims during the preindex period for an ICS or leukotriene receptor antagonist, an asthma-related emergency department visit or hospitalization, >or=2 courses of oral corticosteroid, or >or=6 canisters of a rescue short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (SABA). Factors associated with appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA therapy were assessed by multivariate logistic regression.
Of 16,205 patients initiated on ICS/LABA therapy, 39.2% met >or=1 criterion for appropriate use-788 of 1417 patients (55.6%) in the BFC group and 5572 of 14,788 patients (37.7%) in the FSC group (P < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of BFC than FSC users met the individual criteria for previous controller medication use (45.7% vs 26.1%, respectively) and high SABA use (9.7% vs 6.1%). BFC users had a significantly higher likelihood of meeting >or=1 appropriateness criterion compared with FSC users (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.60-2.00; P < 0.001). Also significantly associated with appropriate use were receipt of the initial ICS/LABA prescription from a pulmonologist or allergist rather than from a physician in family medicine/general practice (P < 0.001), residence in the West relative to the Northeast (P < 0.005), and presence of specific comorbidities (allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and acute respiratory infection; all, P < 0.001).
Just under 40% of patients met the criteria for appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA therapy, with significantly greater proportions of BFC than FSC users meeting the overall and individual criteria for appropriate use. Patients with appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA therapy were significantly more likely to be treated by pulmonologists and allergists than by family medicine/general practitioners.
对于那些其他维持治疗不能充分控制哮喘的患者和中重度哮喘患者,推荐使用吸入皮质激素和长效β2-激动剂(ICS/LABA)联合治疗。
本研究根据医疗保健使用标准以及美国患者使用两种可用疗法之一的处方比例,考察了开始 ICS/LABA 联合治疗的适宜性。
本回顾性队列研究分析了 2007 年 7 月 1 日至 2008 年 6 月 30 日期间开始丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FSC)或布地奈德/福莫特罗富马酸二水合物(BFC)ICS/LABA 联合治疗的年龄在 12 至 64 岁之间的商业保险哮喘患者的数据。在 12 个月的索引前期间未接受 ICS/LABA 治疗的连续入组患者根据其最初的 ICS/LABA 处方(索引日期)被分配到 BFC 或 FSC 队列。根据哮喘恶化、高损害和先前控制药物使用的风险,确定 ICS/LABA 联合治疗的适宜起始。具体而言,如果患者在索引前期间有 ICS 或白三烯受体拮抗剂、哮喘相关急诊就诊或住院、>或=2 个疗程的口服皮质类固醇或>或=6 个剂量的速效β2-激动剂(SABA)的报销,则认为开始 ICS/LABA 治疗是合适的。通过多变量逻辑回归评估与 ICS/LABA 治疗适宜起始相关的因素。
在开始 ICS/LABA 治疗的 16205 例患者中,39.2%符合>或=1 项适宜使用标准-在 BFC 组中,有 788 例(55.6%)符合标准,在 FSC 组中,有 5572 例(37.7%)符合标准(P<0.001)。与 FSC 使用者相比,BFC 使用者明显更符合先前控制药物使用(分别为 45.7%和 26.1%)和高 SABA 使用(分别为 9.7%和 6.1%)的个人标准。与 FSC 使用者相比,BFC 使用者更有可能符合>或=1 项适宜标准(比值比=1.79;95%置信区间,1.60-2.00;P<0.001)。从肺病专家或过敏症专家而不是家庭医学/普通科医生开具初始 ICS/LABA 处方(P<0.001)、居住在西部而不是东北部(P<0.005)以及存在特定合并症(变应性鼻炎、鼻窦炎、胃食管反流病和急性呼吸道感染;均为 P<0.001)也与适宜使用显著相关。
只有不到 40%的患者符合 ICS/LABA 治疗适宜起始的标准,与 FSC 使用者相比,BFC 使用者明显更符合总体和个人适宜使用标准。开始 ICS/LABA 治疗的患者更有可能由肺病专家和过敏症专家治疗,而不是由家庭医学/普通科医生治疗。