Suppr超能文献

文拉法辛缓释片和胶囊在空腹和进食状态下单次及多次给药的生物等效性:四项在健康志愿者中开展的开放标签、随机交叉试验。

Bioequivalence of single and multiple doses of venlafaxine extended-release tablets and capsules in the fasted and fed states: four open-label, randomized crossover trials in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

Upstate Pharma, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2722-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venlafaxine extended-release (ER) tablets use osmotic pressure to deliver venlafaxine hydrochloride at a controlled rate over approximately 24 hours.

OBJECTIVE

These studies were conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of venlafaxine ER tablets and capsules based on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) definition.

METHODS

Four pharmacokinetic studies of the capsule (reference) and tablet (test) formulations were conducted in healthy adult volunteers. The first 2 were randomized, single-dose, 4-way crossover studies of either a 37.5-mg dose (study A) or a 75-mg dose (study B) of the reference and test products under fasting and fed conditions. The other 2 were randomized, 2-way crossover studies of either a single dose (study C) or multiple doses (study D) of venlafaxine ER 225 mg, delivered as one venlafaxine ER 225-mg tablet or one 150-mg + one 75-mg venlafaxine ER capsules under fed conditions. The primary outcome measures were the log-transformed C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity). If the 90% CIs for the ratios of the least squares means of the primary outcome measures between the reference and test formulations fell within the regulatory range (80%-125%), the 2 formulations would be considered bioequivalent according to the FDA definition.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects (21 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 28.0 [8.7] years; mean weight, 161.0 [26.0] lb) were enrolled in study A and completed all treatment periods. Thirty-six subjects were enrolled in study B, of whom 30 (22 men, 8 women; mean age, 33.5 [9.6] years; mean weight, 172.7 [23.9] lb) completed all treatment periods. Thirty-six subjects were enrolled in study C, of whom 28 (16 men, 12 women; mean age, 33.1 [12.9] years; mean weight, 160.6 [29.6] lb) completed the study. Thirty-four subjects were enrolled in study D, of whom 33 (29 men, 4 women; mean age, 26.0 [8.1] years; mean weight, 178.0 [30.3] lb) completed the study. In study A, the 90% CIs for the log-transformed ratio (test vs reference) of C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) in the fasted state were 95.58 to 107.48, 97.58 to 111.09, and 100.31 to 112.85, respectively; in the fed state, the corresponding values were 84.26 to 94.86, 93.49 to 106.58, and 98.98 to 111.91. In study B, the respective values in the fasted state were 113.07 to 126.10, 111.11 to 124.57, and 106.86 and 120.71; in the fed state, the values were 90.50 to 100.90, 96.80 to 108.50, and 95.05 to 107.21. In study C, fed values were 94.15 to 109.37, 103.8 to 115.85, and 102.64 to 113.39. In study D, which involved multiple doses, fed values for C(max) and AUC(0-t) were 82.26 to 88.77 and 101.16 to 109.45, respectively. Adverse effects included nausea, vomiting, dizziness, syncope, and somnolence.

CONCLUSIONS

In these single- and multiple-dose studies, all doses of venlafaxine ER tablets tested met the FDA criterion for bioequivalence to the equivalent doses of venlafaxine ER capsules in the fed state. In the fasted state, the bioequivalence criterion was met for venlafaxine ER 37.5-mg tablets but not venlafaxine 75-mg tablets.

摘要

背景

文拉法辛控释(ER)片剂利用渗透压以大约 24 小时的控制速率释放盐酸文拉法辛。

目的

这些研究旨在根据美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的定义,评估文拉法辛 ER 片剂和胶囊的生物等效性。

方法

在健康成年志愿者中进行了 4 项关于胶囊(参比)和片剂(测试)制剂的药代动力学研究。前 2 项是随机、单剂量、4 交叉研究,参比和测试产品的剂量分别为 37.5mg(研究 A)或 75mg(研究 B),在空腹和进食条件下进行。另外 2 项是随机、2 交叉研究,参比和测试产品的剂量分别为单剂量(研究 C)或多次剂量(研究 D),分别为文拉法辛 ER 225mg 1 片或 150mg+75mg 文拉法辛 ER 胶囊 1 片,在进食条件下进行。主要观察指标是对数转换后的 C(max)、AUC(0-t)和 AUC(0-∞)。如果参考制剂和测试制剂的主要观察指标的最小二乘均值比值的 90%置信区间(80%-125%)落在监管范围内,则根据 FDA 的定义,这两种制剂被认为是生物等效的。

结果

36 名受试者(21 名男性,15 名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,28.0[8.7]岁;平均体重,161.0[26.0]磅)参加了研究 A,并完成了所有治疗期。36 名受试者参加了研究 B,其中 30 名(22 名男性,8 名女性;平均年龄,33.5[9.6]岁;平均体重,172.7[23.9]磅)完成了所有治疗期。36 名受试者参加了研究 C,其中 28 名(16 名男性,12 名女性;平均年龄,33.1[12.9]岁;平均体重,160.6[29.6]磅)完成了研究。34 名受试者参加了研究 D,其中 33 名(29 名男性,4 名女性;平均年龄,26.0[8.1]岁;平均体重,178.0[30.3]磅)完成了研究。在研究 A 中,空腹状态下参比和测试制剂 C(max)、AUC(0-t)和 AUC(0-∞)的对数转换比值的 90%置信区间分别为 95.58 至 107.48、97.58 至 111.09 和 100.31 至 112.85;在进食状态下,相应的值分别为 84.26 至 94.86、93.49 至 106.58 和 98.98 至 111.91。在研究 B 中,空腹状态下的比值分别为 113.07 至 126.10、111.11 至 124.57 和 106.86 至 120.71;在进食状态下,相应的值分别为 90.50 至 100.90、96.80 至 108.50 和 95.05 至 107.21。在研究 C 中,进食状态下的比值分别为 94.15 至 109.37、103.8 至 115.85 和 102.64 至 113.39。在研究 D 中,涉及多次剂量,进食状态下 C(max)和 AUC(0-t)的比值分别为 82.26 至 88.77 和 101.16 至 109.45。不良反应包括恶心、呕吐、头晕、晕厥和嗜睡。

结论

在这些单剂量和多剂量研究中,测试的所有文拉法辛 ER 片剂剂量均符合 FDA 关于在进食状态下与文拉法辛 ER 胶囊等效剂量生物等效的标准。在空腹状态下,文拉法辛 ER 37.5mg 片剂符合生物等效性标准,但文拉法辛 75mg 片剂不符合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验