Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neonatology. 2010 Jun;98(1):91-9. doi: 10.1159/000276980. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is currently treated with surfactant preparations obtained from natural sources and attempts to develop equally active synthetic surfactants have been unsuccessful. One difference in composition is that naturally derived surfactants contain the two hydrophobic proteins SP-B and SP-C while synthetic preparations contain analogues of either SP-B or SP-C. It was recently shown that both SP-B and SP-C (or SP-C33, an SP-C analogue) are necessary to establish alveolar stability at end-expiration in a rabbit RDS model, as reflected by high lung gas volumes without application of positive end-expiratory pressure.
To study the efficacy of fully synthetic surfactants containing analogues of both SP-B and SP-C compared to surfactants with only one protein analogue.
Premature newborn rabbits, treated with synthetic surfactants, were ventilated for 30 min without positive end-expiratory pressure. Tidal volumes as well as lung gas volumes at end-expiration were determined.
Treatment with 2% Mini-B (a short-cut version of SP-B) and 2% SP-C33, or its C-terminally truncated form SP-C30, in 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine/1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol, 68:31 (w/w) resulted in median lung gas volumes of 8-9 ml/kg body weight, while animals treated with 2% Mini-B surfactant or 2% SP-C33/SP-C30 surfactant had lung gas volumes of 3-4 ml/kg, and those treated with Curosurf, a porcine surfactant, 15-17 ml/kg. In contrast, mixing SP-C33 with peptides with different distributions of positively charged and hydrophobic residues did not improve lung gas volumes.
The data indicate that synthetic surfactants containing analogues of both SP-B and SP-C might be superior to single-peptide surfactants in the treatment of RDS.
目前,呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的治疗方法是使用源自天然来源的表面活性剂制剂,并尝试开发同样有效的合成表面活性剂,但均未成功。组成上的一个差异是,天然衍生的表面活性剂含有两种疏水性蛋白 SP-B 和 SP-C,而合成制剂则含有 SP-B 或 SP-C 的类似物。最近的研究表明,SP-B 和 SP-C(或 SP-C33,一种 SP-C 类似物)对于在兔 RDS 模型中在呼气末期建立肺泡稳定性都是必需的,这反映在没有施加呼气末正压的情况下,肺气体量较高。
研究含有 SP-B 和 SP-C 类似物的全合成表面活性剂与仅含有一种蛋白类似物的表面活性剂相比的疗效。
用合成表面活性剂处理的早产兔,在没有呼气末正压的情况下通气 30 分钟。测定潮气量和呼气末的肺气体量。
用 2% Mini-B(SP-B 的短截版本)和 2% SP-C33 或其 C 端截断形式 SP-C30,在 1,2-二棕榈酰基-sn-甘油-3-磷酸胆碱/1-棕榈酰基-2-油酰基-sn-甘油-3-磷酸甘油,68:31(w/w)中治疗,导致中位肺气体量为 8-9ml/kg 体重,而用 2% Mini-B 表面活性剂或 2% SP-C33/SP-C30 表面活性剂治疗的动物的肺气体量为 3-4ml/kg,而用 Curosurf(一种猪源表面活性剂)治疗的动物的肺气体量为 15-17ml/kg。相比之下,将 SP-C33 与具有不同带正电荷和疏水性残基分布的肽混合并不能改善肺气体量。
数据表明,含有 SP-B 和 SP-C 类似物的合成表面活性剂在治疗 RDS 方面可能优于单肽表面活性剂。