Suppr超能文献

一项关于Cop 1治疗慢性进行性多发性硬化症的安慰剂对照、双盲、随机、双中心试点试验。

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, two-center, pilot trial of Cop 1 in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Bornstein M B, Miller A, Slagle S, Weitzman M, Drexler E, Keilson M, Spada V, Weiss W, Appel S, Rolak L

机构信息

Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.

出版信息

Neurology. 1991 Apr;41(4):533-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.4.533.

Abstract

We found Cop 1 to be effective and relatively safe in a previous (exacerbating-remitting) clinical trial. This current trial involves 106 chronic-progressive patients. The major end point, confirmed progression of 1.0 or 1.5 units (depending on baseline disability) on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, was observed in nine (17.6%) treated and 14 (25.5%) control patients. The differences between the overall survival curves were not significant. Progression rates at 12 and 24 months were higher for the placebo group (p = 0.088) with 2-year probabilities of progressing of 20.4% for Cop 1 and 29.5% for placebo. We found a significant difference at 24 months between placebo and Cop 1 at one but not the other center. Two-year progression rates for two secondary end points, unconfirmed progression, and progression of 0.5 EDSS units, (p = 0.03) are significant.

摘要

在之前一项(缓解-复发型)临床试验中,我们发现Cop 1有效且相对安全。当前这项试验纳入了106例慢性进展型患者。在接受治疗的9例(17.6%)患者和14例(25.5%)对照患者中观察到主要终点事件,即根据Kurtzke扩展残疾状态量表确认进展1.0或1.5个单位(取决于基线残疾程度)。总生存曲线之间的差异不显著。安慰剂组在12个月和24个月时的进展率更高(p = 0.088),Cop 1组2年进展概率为20.4%,安慰剂组为29.5%。我们发现在其中一个而非另一个中心,安慰剂组和Cop 1组在24个月时存在显著差异。两个次要终点事件的2年进展率,即未确认的进展以及EDSS评分进展0.5个单位,具有显著差异(p = 0.03)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验