Zhou Cai-Yun, Pan Zheng, Ma Fang, Tang Jin-Yang
The Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beiling 100091, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Dec;22(12):917-9.
To observe the clinical efficacy on analgesia and detumescence of Cheezheng Qingpeng ointment in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
From December 2004 to May 2006, 78 patients were divided into the treatment group and the control group randomly using PROC PLAN from SAS software. There were 40 patients in the treatment group, 30 patients were male and 10 patients were female, with an average age of (48.2+/-9.7) years, who were treated with Cheezheng Qingpeng ointment external treatment. Thirty-eight patients were in the control group, 30 patients were male and 8 patients were female, with an average age of (47.7+/-13.7) years, and were treated with Diclofenac diethylamine emugel. All the patients were treated for 2 weeks. The metacarpophalangeal joint with most severe pain and swelling was observed. The indexes including joint pain, tenderness, swelling, joint motion and morning stiffness were detected and the VAS scores were compared between the two groups.
All the patients completed the trial, 35 patients in the treatment group and 33 patients in the control group. At the end of 2 weeks, 1 patient in the treatment group obtained an excellent result, 27 good and 7 bad; in the control group, 2 patients got an excellent result, 20 good and 11 bad. There were no statistically difference of therapeutic effects between the two groups. At the 1st week after treatment, the joint swelling score of the treatment group was (4.0+/-1.4), which was lower than the (5.5+/-1.9) in the control group.
There is no obvious difference of therapeutic effects between Cheezheng Qingpeng ointment and diclofenac diethylamine emugel for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but the relieving of swelling of Cheezheng Qingpeng ointment is better than that of Diclofenac Diethylamine Emugel.
观察奇正青鹏软膏治疗类风湿关节炎的镇痛、消肿临床疗效。
2004年12月至2006年5月,采用SAS软件中的PROC PLAN程序将78例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组40例,男30例,女10例,平均年龄(48.2±9.7)岁,采用奇正青鹏软膏外用治疗。对照组38例,男30例,女8例,平均年龄(47.7±13.7)岁,采用双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂治疗。所有患者均治疗2周。观察疼痛和肿胀最严重的掌指关节。检测关节疼痛、压痛、肿胀、关节活动度和晨僵等指标,并比较两组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。
所有患者均完成试验,治疗组35例,对照组33例。治疗2周结束时,治疗组1例患者疗效为优,27例为良,7例为差;对照组2例患者疗效为优,20例为良,11例为差。两组治疗效果无统计学差异。治疗后第1周,治疗组关节肿胀评分为(4.0±1.4),低于对照组的(5.5±1.9)。
奇正青鹏软膏与双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效无明显差异,但奇正青鹏软膏的消肿效果优于双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂。