Suppr超能文献

儿童期的病毒和细菌感染:C反应蛋白的价值

Viral and bacterial infection in childhood: the value of C reactive protein.

作者信息

Stanley T V, Barrett D, Salmond C E

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Wellington Hospital.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1991 Apr 10;104(909):138-9.

PMID:2011307
Abstract

In 199 children with acute infections admitted to an acute general paediatric ward, the serum C reactive protein (CRP) level, using a simple latex agglutination kit, was compared with standard haematological parameters in distinguishing children with viral and bacterial infections. CRP levels proved superior to any haematological parameters singly or in combination in distinguishing these groups. A CRP level of 1:4 identified all but 13% of children with viral infections and excluded all but 15% of children with bacterial infections. The sensitivity of the test was 87%, the specificity 85%. The positive and negative predictive values were 95% and 74% respectively. Combined haematology, using total white cell count, total neutrophil count and percentage neutrophils, misclassified 26% of patients. CRP estimation could potentially help reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescription and shorten hospitalisation in febrile children. Its use in a general practice setting deserves further study.

摘要

在一家普通儿科急症病房收治的199名急性感染患儿中,使用一种简单的乳胶凝集试剂盒检测血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,并将其与标准血液学参数进行比较,以区分病毒感染和细菌感染的患儿。结果证明,CRP水平在区分这些组别方面优于任何单一或组合的血液学参数。CRP水平为1:4时,可识别除13%以外的所有病毒感染患儿,并排除除15%以外的所有细菌感染患儿。该检测的敏感性为87%,特异性为85%。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为95%和74%。综合血液学指标,即白细胞总数、中性粒细胞总数和中性粒细胞百分比,将26%的患者误诊。CRP检测可能有助于减少发热儿童不必要的抗生素处方并缩短住院时间。其在全科医疗环境中的应用值得进一步研究。

相似文献

6
[CRP versus BSE in pediatrics. How good is a diagnostic test?].
Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd. 1990 Oct;58(5):169-74.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验