The S. Daniel Abraham Center for Health and Nutrition, Department of Epidemilogy, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;86 Suppl 1:S41-8. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(09)70008-7.
Dietary intervention is recognized as a key component in prevention and management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and the debate persists: which dietary strategy is most effective. In the Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT) 322 moderately obese participants were randomized for 2 years to one of three diet groups: low-fat, Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate. Differential effects were observed in the sub-group of patients with T2DM at 24 months: participants randomized to the Mediterranean diet, which had the highest intake of dietary fibers and unsaturated to saturated fat ratio, achieved greater significant improvements in fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels. Patients who were randomized to the low-carbohydrate diet, which had the minimal intake of carbohydrates, achieved a significant reduction of hemoglobin A1C. Although improvements were observed in all groups, the low-fat diet was likely to be less beneficial in terms of glycemic control and lipid metabolism. Interpretation of results from different studies on dietary strategies may be complex since there is often no consistency in diet compositions, calorie restriction, intensity of intervention, dietary assessment or extent of adherence in the trial. Nevertheless, it seems that low fat restricted calorie diets are effective for weight loss and are associated with some metabolic benefits; however, some recent trials have shown that low carbohydrate diets are as efficient in inducing weight loss and in some metabolic measures such as serum triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol may be even superior to low fat diets. When addressing the issue of diet quality rather than quantity applying the glycemic index may have some added benefits. Furthermore special features of the Mediterranean diet have apparent additional favorable effects for patients with T2DM.
饮食干预被认为是预防和治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的关键组成部分,关于哪种饮食策略最有效的争论仍在继续。在饮食干预随机对照试验(DIRECT)中,322 名中度肥胖的参与者被随机分为 3 组饮食:低脂、地中海和低碳水化合物。在 24 个月时,T2DM 亚组观察到了不同的效果:随机分配到地中海饮食组的患者,其膳食纤维和不饱和脂肪与饱和脂肪的比例最高,空腹血糖和胰岛素水平显著改善。随机分配到低碳水化合物饮食组的患者,碳水化合物摄入量最少,血红蛋白 A1C 显著降低。虽然所有组都观察到了改善,但低脂饮食在血糖控制和脂质代谢方面可能不太有益。由于不同研究中关于饮食策略的结果可能存在差异,因此解释结果可能很复杂,因为在试验中,饮食成分、热量限制、干预强度、饮食评估或依从性程度通常不一致。然而,似乎低脂肪限制热量的饮食对减肥有效,并与一些代谢益处相关;然而,一些最近的试验表明,低碳水化合物饮食在诱导体重减轻和一些代谢指标方面同样有效,如血清甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,甚至可能优于低脂肪饮食。当解决饮食质量而不是数量的问题时,应用血糖指数可能会有一些额外的好处。此外,地中海饮食的特殊特征对 T2DM 患者有明显的额外益处。