Hassan Mohammad, Seoud Diaa Eldin A
Department of Oncology, Erfan Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2009;2(2):340-4. doi: 10.1016/s1658-3876(09)50022-2.
Complete surgical resection is the main goal in the treatment of thymoma, but is not always achievable in stage III and IVA thymoma because of local invasion of the neighboring organs or the presence of diffuse pleural or pericardial implants. We reviewed our experience in multimodality treatment of advanced stage (III and IVA) thymic tumors to evaluate the effectiveness and safety in patients with locally advanced unresectable thymoma.
We studied patients with newly diagnosed, histologically proven, unresectable malignant thymoma who underwent a multimodality treatment regimen that consisted of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (three courses of cisplatin and etoposide), followed by surgical resection, postoperative radiation therapy, and consolidation chemotherapy (three courses of cisplatin and etposide).
Nine patients were consecutively enrolled from December 2001 to June 2007, and all were valuable for assessment. Disease responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy completely in 1 patient (11%) and partially in 6 patients (66%) with an overall response of 77%. Two patients had a minor response (22%). Eight patients had surgical resection; 1 refused surgery. Tumors were removed completely in 5 patients (62.5%) and incompletely in 3 (37.5%). All patients received radiation therapy and consolidation chemotherapy. Seven patients were alive (77% at 4 years), with a median follow-up of 31 months, and 6 patients were disease free (66.6% disease-free survival at 4 years). The major side effect from neoadjuvant and consolidation chemotherapy was myelosuppression.
The multimodality treatment of stage III and IVA thymic tumors by integration of surgery, radio- therapy, and chemotherapy, contributed to a good long-term outcome. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the resectability rate and the survival of locally advanced stages of the disease.
完整手术切除是胸腺瘤治疗的主要目标,但对于Ⅲ期和ⅣA期胸腺瘤,由于邻近器官受局部侵犯或存在弥漫性胸膜或心包种植转移,往往难以实现。我们回顾了晚期(Ⅲ期和ⅣA期)胸腺肿瘤多模式治疗的经验,以评估局部晚期不可切除胸腺瘤患者的有效性和安全性。
我们研究了新诊断、经组织学证实为不可切除的恶性胸腺瘤患者,这些患者接受了多模式治疗方案,包括新辅助化疗(三个疗程的顺铂和依托泊苷),随后进行手术切除、术后放疗和巩固化疗(三个疗程的顺铂和依托泊苷)。
2001年12月至2007年6月连续纳入9例患者,所有患者均对评估有价值。新辅助化疗后,1例患者(11%)疾病完全缓解,6例患者(66%)部分缓解,总体缓解率为77%。2例患者有轻微缓解(22%)。8例患者接受了手术切除;1例拒绝手术。5例患者(62.5%)肿瘤完全切除,3例患者(37.5%)不完全切除。所有患者均接受了放疗和巩固化疗。7例患者存活(4年生存率77%),中位随访时间为31个月,6例患者无疾病复发(4年无病生存率66.6%)。新辅助化疗和巩固化疗的主要副作用是骨髓抑制。
手术、放疗和化疗相结合的多模式治疗Ⅲ期和ⅣA期胸腺肿瘤,有助于获得良好的长期疗效。新辅助化疗提高了局部晚期疾病的可切除率和生存率。