Nakayama Jun, Miyasaka Kazuo, Omatsu Tokuhiko, Onodera Yuuya, Terae Satoshi, Matsuno Yoshihiro, Cho Yasushi, Hida Yasuhiro, Kaga Kichizo, Shirato Hiroki
Medical Image Lab, Inc., Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita-ku, Saporo, Japan.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Jan;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181a9cc07.
To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (DW-MR) imaging for detection of metastases in lymph nodes by using quantitative analysis.
Seventy patients with non-small cell lung cancer were examined with DW and short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) turbo-spin-echo MR imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficient of each lung cancer and lymph node was calculated from DW-MR images. Difference of the apparent diffusion coefficient in a lung cancer and a lymph node was calculated (D1). From STIR turbo-spin-echo MR images, ratios of signal intensity in a lymph node to that in a 0.9% saline phantom was calculated (lymph node-saline ratio [LSR1]). For quantitative analysis, the threshold value for a positive test was determined on a per node basis and tested for ability to enable a correct diagnosis on a per patient basis. Results of quantitative analyses of DW- and STIR-MR images were compared on a per patient basis with McNemar testing.
Mean D1 in the lymph node group with metastases was lower than that in the group without metastases (P < 0.001). When an D1 of 0.24 x 10(-3) mm2/s was used as the positive test threshold, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 69.2%, 100%, and 94.0%, respectively, on a per patient basis. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between quantitative analyses of DW-MR images and STIR-MR images.
Quantitative analysis of DW-MR images enables differentiation of lymph nodes with metastasis from those without.
通过定量分析评估扩散加权磁共振成像(DW-MR)检测淋巴结转移的情况。
对70例非小细胞肺癌患者进行DW和短反转时间反转恢复(STIR)快速自旋回波磁共振成像检查。从DW-MR图像计算每个肺癌和淋巴结的表观扩散系数。计算肺癌和淋巴结表观扩散系数的差值(D1)。从STIR快速自旋回波磁共振图像计算淋巴结与0.9%生理盐水模拟物的信号强度比值(淋巴结-生理盐水比值[LSR1])。对于定量分析,在每个淋巴结基础上确定阳性检测的阈值,并在每个患者基础上测试其进行正确诊断的能力。将DW-和STIR-MR图像定量分析的结果在每个患者基础上用McNemar检验进行比较。
有转移的淋巴结组的平均D1低于无转移组(P < 0.001)。当将D1为0.24×10⁻³mm²/s用作阳性检测阈值时,在每个患者基础上,敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为69.2%、100%和94.0%。DW-MR图像和STIR-MR图像的定量分析之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
DW-MR图像的定量分析能够区分有转移和无转移的淋巴结。