Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Berlin, Germany.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):136-46. doi: 10.1037/a0017172.
Fernandez-Duque and Knight (2008, Experiment 4) described an across-task effect of endogenously generated, anticipatory control: A cue that predicted conflict in an upcoming Eriksen flanker task modulated conflict regulation in a subsequent number Stroop task. In 3 experiments, 1 of which included an exact replication condition, we failed to observe the expected across-task effect. However, a reanalysis of our data revealed a conflict adaptation effect: Number task processing on incongruent trials was influenced by random fluctuations in flanker task performance. Our findings, alongside reports of reactive across-task conflict regulation (Freitas, Bahar, Yang, & Banai, 2007), challenge Fernandez-Duque and Knight's claim that across-task effects are a distinctive feature of anticipatory cognitive control.
费尔南德斯-杜克和奈特(2008 年,实验 4)描述了内源性产生的、预期性控制的跨任务效应:一个预示即将到来的艾瑞克森侧翼任务冲突的线索,调节了随后的数字斯特鲁普任务中的冲突调节。在 3 项实验中,其中 1 项包括了一个精确的复制条件,我们未能观察到预期的跨任务效应。然而,对我们数据的重新分析揭示了一种冲突适应效应:在不一致试验上的数字任务处理受到侧翼任务表现的随机波动的影响。我们的发现,以及关于反应性跨任务冲突调节的报告(Freitas、Bahar、Yang 和 Banai,2007),挑战了费尔南德斯-杜克和奈特的主张,即跨任务效应是预期性认知控制的一个独特特征。