Suppr超能文献

哪些医生和实践特征与遵循抑郁和焦虑障碍的循证指南有关?

Which physician and practice characteristics are associated with adherence to evidence-based guidelines for depressive and anxiety disorders?

机构信息

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):240-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca27f6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research on quality of care for depressive and anxiety disorders has reported low rates of adherence to evidence-based depression and anxiety guidelines. To improve this care, we need a better understanding of the factors determining guideline adherence.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how practice- and professional-related factors are associated with adherence to these guidelines.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 665 patients with a composite interview diagnostic instrument diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorders, and 62 general practitioners from 21 practices participated.

MEASURES

Actual care data were derived from electronic medical record data. The measurement of guideline adherence was based on performance indicators derived from evidence-based guidelines. Practice-, professional-, and patient-related characteristics were measured with questionnaires. The characteristics associated with guideline adherence were assessed by multivariate multilevel regression analysis.

RESULTS

A number of practice and professional characteristics showed a significant univariate association with guideline adherence. The multivariate multilevel analyses revealed that, after controlling for patient characteristics, higher rates of guideline adherence were associated with stronger confidence in depression identification, less perceived time limitations, and less perceived barriers for guideline implementation. These professional-related determinants differed among the overall concept of guideline adherence and the various treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that rates of adherence to guidelines on depressive and anxiety disorders were not associated with practice characteristics, but to some extent with physician characteristics. Although most of the identified professional-related determinants are very difficult to change, our results give some directions for improving depression and anxiety care.

摘要

背景

针对抑郁和焦虑障碍护理质量的研究报告称,遵循基于证据的抑郁和焦虑指南的比例较低。为了改善这种护理,我们需要更好地了解决定指南遵循的因素。

目的

调查实践和专业相关因素与这些指南遵循的相关性。

设计

横断面队列研究。

参与者

共有 665 名符合复合访谈诊断工具诊断的抑郁或焦虑障碍患者和 21 个实践中的 62 名全科医生参加了该研究。

措施

实际护理数据来源于电子病历数据。指南遵循的测量是基于从循证指南中得出的绩效指标。实践、专业和患者相关特征通过问卷调查进行测量。通过多变量多层次回归分析评估与指南遵循相关的特征。

结果

一些实践和专业特征与指南遵循存在显著的单变量关联。多变量多层次分析显示,在控制患者特征后,更高的指南遵循率与更强的抑郁识别信心、更少的感知时间限制和更少的指南实施障碍相关。这些专业相关的决定因素在总体指南遵循概念和各种治疗选择中存在差异。

结论

本研究表明,对抑郁和焦虑障碍指南的遵循率与实践特征无关,但在一定程度上与医生特征有关。尽管大多数确定的专业相关决定因素很难改变,但我们的研究结果为改善抑郁和焦虑护理提供了一些方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验