Sidell Douglas, Shamouelian David, Erman Andrew, Gerratt Bruce R, Chhetri Dinesh
Division of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1624, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 Jan;119(1):37-41. doi: 10.1177/000348941011900107.
Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for postlaryngectomy speech is increasingly being performed as an office-based procedure. We review our experience with office-based TEP and compare outcomes with those of operating room-based TEP. Our hypothesis was that office-based TEP results in improved prosthesis sizing, reducing the number of visits dedicated to prosthesis resizing.
A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent secondary TEP at our institution from 2001 to 2008. The primary dependent measure was the change in the length of the voice prosthesis. We also evaluated the number of visits made to the speech-language pathologist for resizing before a stable prosthesis length was achieved, and the number of days between voice prosthesis placement and the date a stable prosthesis length was observed.
Thirty-one patients were included in this study. There was a significant difference in prosthesis length change between patients who had office-based TEP and patients who had operating room-based TEP (p < 0.001). In addition, the office-based cohort required fewer visits to the speech-language pathologist for TEP adjustments before a stable TEP length was achieved (p < 0.001).
Voice prosthesis sizing was better in patients who had office-based TEP than in patients who had operating room-based TEP. This outcome is likely due to the lesser degree of swelling of the tracheoesophageal party wall in the office-based procedure.
作为一种门诊手术,用于喉切除术后发声的气管食管穿刺(TEP)越来越多地被开展。我们回顾了我们在门诊进行TEP的经验,并将结果与在手术室进行TEP的结果进行比较。我们的假设是,门诊TEP能改善人工喉尺寸的确定,减少用于人工喉尺寸调整的就诊次数。
对2001年至2008年在我们机构接受二次TEP的所有患者进行回顾性病历审查。主要的因变量是人工喉长度的变化。我们还评估了在达到稳定的人工喉长度之前,患者为调整人工喉尺寸而拜访言语病理学家的次数,以及人工喉植入日期与观察到稳定的人工喉长度日期之间的天数。
本研究纳入了31例患者。接受门诊TEP的患者与接受手术室TEP的患者在人工喉长度变化方面存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。此外,在达到稳定的TEP长度之前,门诊组患者为调整TEP而拜访言语病理学家的次数更少(p < 0.001)。
接受门诊TEP的患者在人工喉尺寸确定方面比接受手术室TEP的患者更好。这一结果可能是由于门诊手术中气管食管间隔壁的肿胀程度较轻。