Hallan G, Dybvik E, Furnes O, Havelin L I
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway. geir.hallan:helse-bergen.no
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Feb;92(2):196-201. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22179.
The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register has shown that several designs of uncemented femoral stems give good or excellent survivorship. The overall findings for uncemented total hip replacement however, have been disappointing because of poor results with the use of metal-backed acetabular components. In this study, we exclusively investigated the medium-to long-term performance of primary uncemented metal-backed acetabular components. A total of 9113 primary uncemented acetabular components were implanted in 7937 patients between 1987 and 2007. These were included in a prospective, population-based observational study. All the implants were modular and metal-backed with ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liners. The femoral heads were made of stainless steel, cobalt-chrome (CoCr) alloy or alumina ceramic. In all, seven different designs of acetabular component were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier survivorship method and Cox regression analysis. Most acetabular components performed well up to seven years. When the endpoint was revision of the acetabular component because of aseptic loosening, the survival ranged between 87% and 100% at ten years. However, when the endpoint was revision for any reason, the survival estimates were 81% to 92% for the same implants at ten years. Aseptic loosening, wear, osteolysis and dislocation were the main reasons for the relatively poor overall performance of the acetabular components. Prostheses with alumina heads performed slightly better than those with stainless steel or CoCr alloy in subgroups. Whereas most acetabular components performed well at seven years, the survivorship declined with longer follow-up. Fixation was generally good. None of the metal-backed uncemented acetabular components with ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liners in our study had satisfactory long-term results because of high rates of wear, osteolysis, aseptic loosening and dislocation.
挪威关节成形术登记处的数据显示,几种非骨水泥型股骨柄设计的假体生存率良好或极佳。然而,非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术的总体结果却令人失望,原因是金属背衬髋臼组件的使用效果不佳。在本研究中,我们专门调查了初次使用的非骨水泥型金属背衬髋臼组件的中长期性能。1987年至2007年间,共7937例患者植入了9113个初次使用的非骨水泥型髋臼组件。这些病例纳入了一项基于人群的前瞻性观察研究。所有植入物均为模块化,带有金属背衬和超高分子量聚乙烯内衬。股骨头由不锈钢、钴铬(CoCr)合金或氧化铝陶瓷制成。总共通过Kaplan-Meier生存率法和Cox回归分析评估了七种不同设计的髋臼组件。大多数髋臼组件在长达七年的时间里表现良好。当终点为因无菌性松动而翻修髋臼组件时,十年生存率在87%至100%之间。然而,当终点为因任何原因进行翻修时,相同植入物在十年时的生存率估计为81%至92%。无菌性松动、磨损、骨溶解和脱位是髋臼组件总体性能相对较差的主要原因。在亚组中,氧化铝股骨头假体的表现略优于不锈钢或CoCr合金股骨头假体。虽然大多数髋臼组件在七年时表现良好,但随着随访时间延长,生存率下降。固定情况总体良好。由于磨损、骨溶解、无菌性松动和脱位发生率较高,我们研究中所有带有超高分子量聚乙烯内衬的非骨水泥型金属背衬髋臼组件均未获得令人满意的长期结果。