Medical Oncology, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Oncology. 2009;77 Suppl 1:122-31. doi: 10.1159/000258504. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) has evolved from being predominantly cytokine-based to being grounded in the use of drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. New agents including the small-molecule targeted inhibitors sunitinib, sorafenib and temsirolimus and the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab have shown anti-tumor efficacy and have become the standard of care for most patients. Sunitinib and temsirolimus have shown significant improvements in overall survival (OS), in the first-line setting, when compared with interferon. Sorafenib has demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in a phase III study in comparison with placebo in the second-line setting. More recently, two phase III studies have compared bevacizumab and interferon with interferon alone. Both studies showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS for the combination arm but no difference in OS. Everolimus showed prolonged PFS in the second/third-line setting. Pazopanib prolongs PFS in naïve/cytokine refractory patients. Immunotherapy confers a small but significant OS advantage but only for the minority of patients with good prognostic features. The results of these trials and ongoing efforts to improve treatment of MRCC are the focus of this review.
转移性肾细胞癌 (MRCC) 的治疗已从主要基于细胞因子的治疗方法发展为基于血管内皮生长因子、血小板衍生生长因子和哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白 (mTOR) 途径的药物治疗。新的药物包括小分子靶向抑制剂舒尼替尼、索拉非尼和替西罗莫司以及单克隆抗体贝伐珠单抗,它们显示出抗肿瘤疗效,并已成为大多数患者的标准治疗方法。与干扰素相比,舒尼替尼和替西罗莫司在一线治疗中显示出显著的总生存期 (OS) 改善。索拉非尼在二线治疗中与安慰剂相比,在一项 III 期研究中显示出延长的无进展生存期 (PFS)。最近,两项 III 期研究比较了贝伐珠单抗和干扰素与干扰素单独治疗的疗效。这两项研究均显示联合治疗组的 PFS 有统计学意义的改善,但 OS 无差异。依维莫司在二线/三线治疗中显示出延长的 PFS。帕唑帕尼延长了初治/细胞因子难治性患者的 PFS。免疫疗法可延长少数预后良好的患者的 OS,但获益很小。这些试验的结果以及正在努力改善 MRCC 治疗的结果是本综述的重点。