Department of Medicine, Southern Arizona Health Care System and University of Arizona School of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(9):950-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04254.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
BACKGROUND: Optimal long-term management of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (sGERD) patients has not been established. AIM: To determine the clinical value of maintenance intermittent treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg vs. placebo in patients with sGERD. METHODS: This multicentre, US study enrolled patients with sGERD (>or=3-month history of GERD symptoms and >or=4 days/week of heartburn during a 2-week placebo run-in) without oesophageal erosions. Patients with complete heartburn control after 4 weeks of open-label rabeprazole 20 mg daily treatment were randomized to 6-month, double-blind, maintenance intermittent treatment (7- to 14-day courses when heartburn recurred) with rabeprazole 20 mg or placebo. RESULTS: The primary efficacy end point, mean percentage of heartburn-free days, was significantly greater with rabeprazole vs. placebo: 82.58% and 62.17% (ITT; P < 0.0001) [per protocol 86.74% rabeprazole vs. 74.93% placebo (P < 0.0254)]. Compared with placebo group, the rabeprazole group also experienced a significantly higher percentage of heartburn-free daytime (84.06% vs. 63.39%; P < 0.0001) and nighttime (95.41% vs. 90.25%; P = 0.0021) periods, had significantly fewer discontinuations because of insufficient heartburn control (6.3% vs. 36.3%; P < 0.0001) and took fewer antacid tablets daily (0.58 vs. 1.16; P = 0.0021). CONCLUSION: Intermittent use of rabeprazole may be an effective maintenance treatment strategy for patients with sGERD and warrants further investigation. This trial was registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT00165841.
背景:症状性胃食管反流病(sGERD)患者的长期最佳治疗方法尚未确定。
目的:确定 sGERD 患者维持间歇性雷贝拉唑 20mg 治疗与安慰剂相比的临床价值。
方法:这项多中心、美国研究纳入了 sGERD 患者(有>3 个月的 GERD 症状史,在 2 周安慰剂导入期内每周>4 天有烧心),且无食管糜烂。在接受 4 周开放性雷贝拉唑 20mg 每日治疗后完全控制烧心的患者中,随机分配至 6 个月、双盲、维持间歇性治疗(当烧心复发时进行 7-14 天疗程),使用雷贝拉唑 20mg 或安慰剂。
结果:主要疗效终点,烧心无发作天数的平均百分比,雷贝拉唑显著优于安慰剂:82.58%和 62.17%(ITT;P < 0.0001)[方案治疗人群 86.74%雷贝拉唑 vs. 74.93%安慰剂(P < 0.0254)]。与安慰剂组相比,雷贝拉唑组还经历了更高比例的烧心无发作白天(84.06% vs. 63.39%;P < 0.0001)和夜间(95.41% vs. 90.25%;P = 0.0021)时间,因烧心控制不足而停药的比例显著更低(6.3% vs. 36.3%;P < 0.0001),每日抗酸剂片剂用量更少(0.58 vs. 1.16;P = 0.0021)。
结论:雷贝拉唑的间歇性使用可能是 sGERD 患者的有效维持治疗策略,值得进一步研究。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00165841。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004-7-15
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002-6
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2024-8