Suppr超能文献

临床试验:在有症状的胃食管反流病患者中使用雷贝拉唑 20mg 进行维持间歇治疗 - 一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究。

Clinical trial: maintenance intermittent therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Southern Arizona Health Care System and University of Arizona School of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(9):950-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04254.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal long-term management of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (sGERD) patients has not been established.

AIM

To determine the clinical value of maintenance intermittent treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg vs. placebo in patients with sGERD.

METHODS

This multicentre, US study enrolled patients with sGERD (>or=3-month history of GERD symptoms and >or=4 days/week of heartburn during a 2-week placebo run-in) without oesophageal erosions. Patients with complete heartburn control after 4 weeks of open-label rabeprazole 20 mg daily treatment were randomized to 6-month, double-blind, maintenance intermittent treatment (7- to 14-day courses when heartburn recurred) with rabeprazole 20 mg or placebo.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy end point, mean percentage of heartburn-free days, was significantly greater with rabeprazole vs. placebo: 82.58% and 62.17% (ITT; P < 0.0001) [per protocol 86.74% rabeprazole vs. 74.93% placebo (P < 0.0254)]. Compared with placebo group, the rabeprazole group also experienced a significantly higher percentage of heartburn-free daytime (84.06% vs. 63.39%; P < 0.0001) and nighttime (95.41% vs. 90.25%; P = 0.0021) periods, had significantly fewer discontinuations because of insufficient heartburn control (6.3% vs. 36.3%; P < 0.0001) and took fewer antacid tablets daily (0.58 vs. 1.16; P = 0.0021).

CONCLUSION

Intermittent use of rabeprazole may be an effective maintenance treatment strategy for patients with sGERD and warrants further investigation. This trial was registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT00165841.

摘要

背景

症状性胃食管反流病(sGERD)患者的长期最佳治疗方法尚未确定。

目的

确定 sGERD 患者维持间歇性雷贝拉唑 20mg 治疗与安慰剂相比的临床价值。

方法

这项多中心、美国研究纳入了 sGERD 患者(有>3 个月的 GERD 症状史,在 2 周安慰剂导入期内每周>4 天有烧心),且无食管糜烂。在接受 4 周开放性雷贝拉唑 20mg 每日治疗后完全控制烧心的患者中,随机分配至 6 个月、双盲、维持间歇性治疗(当烧心复发时进行 7-14 天疗程),使用雷贝拉唑 20mg 或安慰剂。

结果

主要疗效终点,烧心无发作天数的平均百分比,雷贝拉唑显著优于安慰剂:82.58%和 62.17%(ITT;P < 0.0001)[方案治疗人群 86.74%雷贝拉唑 vs. 74.93%安慰剂(P < 0.0254)]。与安慰剂组相比,雷贝拉唑组还经历了更高比例的烧心无发作白天(84.06% vs. 63.39%;P < 0.0001)和夜间(95.41% vs. 90.25%;P = 0.0021)时间,因烧心控制不足而停药的比例显著更低(6.3% vs. 36.3%;P < 0.0001),每日抗酸剂片剂用量更少(0.58 vs. 1.16;P = 0.0021)。

结论

雷贝拉唑的间歇性使用可能是 sGERD 患者的有效维持治疗策略,值得进一步研究。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00165841。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验