Orthodontic Department, Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):363-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp141. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
The first aim of this study was to identify any difference in the perception of facial normality between orthodontists and lay people of patients with the initial presentation of a Class II division 1 malocclusion, the second is to investigate whether there was an identifiable facial change following Twin Block (TB) therapy, and lastly, the relationship between identifiable facial change and clinical measurements was explored. Animated laser scans of 16 randomly selected adolescent patients, nine males aged 12-14 years and seven females aged 11-13 years with Class II division 1 malocclusions before and after TB therapy, were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) by 34 orthodontists and 35 lay people. The 'Mark and Measure' and 'Orientated' techniques were used to determine soft tissue dimensions. Overjet was also recorded. Non-parametric statistical analyses were employed, including Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon signed value, and Spearman's rank-order correlation tests. There was no statistically significant difference in facial normality scores of adolescents before TB therapy when assessed by orthodontists (46.2 mm) and lay people (50.9 mm; P = 0.120). However, TB therapy significantly improved the assessment score of the orthodontists (54.8 mm) and lay people (57.8 mm; P = 0.000). Using a 5 per cent threshold in categorization of change in VAS scores, the majority of assessors perceived an overall 'improvement' (87.0 per cent). An increase in soft tissue lower face height (ST LFH) and overjet reduction was strongly correlated with the higher assessments of lay people (r = 0.515) and orthodontists (r = -0.505), respectively. Although orthodontists and lay people assess facial normality of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions similarly, following TB therapy an increase in ST LFH with lay people and overjet reduction with orthodontists were most closely related to improved facial normality.
本研究的首要目的是,识别出正畸医生与非专业人士对刚出现安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合患者的面部正常感知的差异;其二,调查 Twin-Block(TB)治疗后是否存在可识别的面部变化;最后,探讨可识别的面部变化与临床测量值之间的关系。16 名随机选择的青少年患者的动画激光扫描,9 名男性(12-14 岁)和 7 名女性(11-13 岁),均患有安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合,在 TB 治疗前后,分别由 34 名正畸医生和 35 名非专业人士用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。采用“标记和测量”及“定向”技术来确定软组织的维度。还记录了覆牙合。采用非参数统计分析,包括曼-惠特尼、Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验和斯皮尔曼等级相关检验。在 TB 治疗前,正畸医生(46.2mm)和非专业人士(50.9mm)评估青少年的面部正常感知评分无统计学差异(P=0.120)。然而,TB 治疗后,正畸医生(54.8mm)和非专业人士(57.8mm)的评估评分显著提高(P=0.000)。在 VAS 评分的分类中,以 5%的阈值作为变化标准,大多数评估者认为总体上存在“改善”(87.0%)。软组织下面高(ST LFH)的增加和覆牙合减少与非专业人士(r=0.515)和正畸医生(r=-0.505)的更高评估密切相关。尽管正畸医生和非专业人士对安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合患者的面部正常感知评估相似,但在 TB 治疗后,ST LFH 的增加与非专业人士,以及覆牙合的减少与正畸医生,与面部正常感知的改善最为密切相关。