St Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
J Med Econ. 2010 Mar;13(1):162-7. doi: 10.3111/13696991003640383.
To describe renal function monitoring practice in patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) treated with IV zoledronic acid (ZA) and oral ibandronic acid (IA), the management pathways and NHS hospital resources used.
Medical records of 189 patients; IA (91), ZA (98) with primary breast cancer and MBD were reviewed, and data collected on renal monitoring and hospital visits during bisphosphonate therapy. Time and motion review of resources to administer the bisphosphonates was also conducted.
Only 30% of patients given ZA and no patient given IA had baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) recorded. Calculated baseline CrCl suggested impaired renal function in 33% ZA and 29% IA patients. Dose reductions were not made correctly in 29 ZA and 2 IA patients whose monitoring suggested it. ZA patients made more clinic and day care attendances than IA-treated patients, at twice the cost. Staff activity and patient time per visit was higher with ZA than IA.
Although limited by retrospective design, these results demonstrate that in many patients, CrCl is not calculated before or during treatment with bisphosphonates. Renal function deteriorated in many patients during therapy. In view of these effects, practice should be reviewed to ensure appropriate dosing.
描述接受静脉注射唑来膦酸(ZA)和口服伊班膦酸(IA)治疗转移性骨病(MBD)的患者的肾功能监测实践,管理途径和 NHS 医院资源的使用情况。
回顾了 189 名原发性乳腺癌和 MBD 患者的医疗记录,其中 IA(91)例,ZA(98)例,并收集了双膦酸盐治疗期间的肾功能监测和医院就诊数据。还对管理双膦酸盐的资源进行了时间和动作审查。
仅 30%接受 ZA 治疗的患者和未接受 IA 治疗的患者记录了基线肌酐清除率(CrCl)。计算的基线 CrCl 表明,33%的 ZA 和 29%的 IA 患者存在肾功能受损。有 29 名 ZA 和 2 名 IA 患者的监测表明需要减少剂量,但未正确进行剂量减少。与接受 IA 治疗的患者相比,ZA 患者的就诊和日间护理就诊次数更多,费用是后者的两倍。与 IA 相比,ZA 患者每次就诊的员工活动和患者时间都更高。
尽管受到回顾性设计的限制,但这些结果表明,在许多患者中,在接受双膦酸盐治疗之前或期间并未计算 CrCl。许多患者在治疗期间肾功能恶化。鉴于这些影响,应审查实践以确保适当的剂量。