Cognitive and Mathematical Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2010 Jul 1;47(4):637-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00973.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
According to the dual-mechanisms of cognitive control framework (DMC), older adults rely predominantly on reactive as opposed to proactive control. As a result, we expected elevated response conflict for older relative to younger adults with increasing task difficulty. Response-locked ERP activity was examined separately for fast and slow responses (representing proactive and reactive control, respectively) at low, medium, and high levels of difficulty. Older adults recruited reactive control more often than the young, as reflected by increased behavioral costs and enhanced pre-response negativity (PRN). No age differences in conflict detection (medial frontal negativity, MFN) were evident at low levels of difficulty, but response conflict increased along with difficulty for older adults. These data provide empirical support for the DMC suggesting that aging is associated with a less efficient reactive-control mode of processing.
根据认知控制的双重机制框架(DMC),老年人主要依赖反应性控制而非前瞻性控制。因此,我们预计随着任务难度的增加,老年人的反应冲突会比年轻人更高。在低、中、高难度水平下,分别对快速和慢速反应(分别代表前瞻性和反应性控制)进行了反应锁定的 ERP 活动研究。与年轻人相比,老年人更多地采用反应性控制,这反映在行为成本增加和预反应负波(PRN)增强上。在低难度水平下,在冲突检测(中额负波,MFN)方面没有明显的年龄差异,但老年人的反应冲突随着难度的增加而增加。这些数据为 DMC 提供了经验支持,表明随着年龄的增长,处理的反应控制模式效率降低。