Suppr超能文献

3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺和 4-甲基硫代苯丙胺对大鼠肝线粒体功能的比较影响。

Comparative effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and 4-methylthioamphetamine on rat liver mitochondrial function.

机构信息

CNC, Laboratório de Bioquímica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Coimbra, 3000-295 Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Toxicology. 2010 Apr 11;270(2-3):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.01.022. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

Abstract

Ecstasy, which is used as a recreational drug, is a common street name for 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Another drug of abuse chemically related, though less common than MDMA, is the amphetamine derivative 4-methylthioamphetamine (MTA). MDMA and MTA induce different systemic and organ-specific effects, including neurotoxicity, hyperthermia, nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Therefore, it is clear that MDMA and MTA are responsible for inducing organ toxicity. The mechanisms underlying MDMA and MTA-induced hepatotoxicity are multifactorial, and therefore not completely understood. Recent findings indicate interference with cellular bioenergetics as an important toxicological feature of ecstasy. However, less is known about the involvement of mitochondria in MTA-induced hepatotoxicity. Thus, we compared the direct influence of MDMA and MTA on rat liver mitochondrial function [mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT), mitochondrial oxidative stress, and mitochondrial bioenergetics]. It was shown that MTA (from 0.025 up to 0.1mM) was more potent than MDMA (from 0.2 up to 0.5mM) in decreasing the sensitivity of rat liver mitochondria to MPT. However, higher concentrations of MTA (from 0.5 up to 2mM) were highly toxic to mitochondria. MTA simultaneously increased H(2)O(2) production in a monoamine oxidase (MAO)-dependent way, and uncoupled and inhibited mitochondrial respiration. In contrast, MDMA had only limited or no effects on these mitochondrial parameters. According to these results, it is possible to postulate that, depending on the concentration, MTA can potentially be more efficient in its effects on liver mitochondria than MDMA and, also, that its harmful effects may contribute to its hepatotoxicity.

摘要

摇头丸,作为一种娱乐性药物,是 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)的常见俗称。另一种滥用药物与 MDMA 在化学上有关联,但不如 MDMA 常见,是安非他命衍生物 4-甲基硫代安非他命(MTA)。MDMA 和 MTA 会引起不同的全身和器官特异性效应,包括神经毒性、体温过高、肾毒性、心脏毒性和肝毒性。因此,很明显,MDMA 和 MTA 是引起器官毒性的原因。MDMA 和 MTA 诱导肝毒性的机制是多因素的,因此尚未完全了解。最近的研究结果表明,细胞生物能学的干扰是摇头丸的一个重要毒理学特征。然而,关于线粒体在 MTA 诱导的肝毒性中的参与知之甚少。因此,我们比较了 MDMA 和 MTA 对大鼠肝线粒体功能的直接影响[线粒体通透性转换(MPT)、线粒体氧化应激和线粒体生物能学]。结果表明,MTA(从 0.025 到 0.1mM)比 MDMA(从 0.2 到 0.5mM)更能降低大鼠肝线粒体对 MPT 的敏感性。然而,更高浓度的 MTA(从 0.5 到 2mM)对线粒体具有高度毒性。MTA 同时以单胺氧化酶(MAO)依赖性方式增加 H2O2 的产生,并解偶联和抑制线粒体呼吸。相比之下,MDMA 对这些线粒体参数只有有限或没有影响。根据这些结果,可以假设,根据浓度的不同,MTA 对肝线粒体的作用可能比 MDMA 更有效,而且其有害作用可能有助于其肝毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验