• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特女性乳腺癌组织芯片生物标志物表达的验证

Validation of tissue microarray biomarker expression of breast carcinomas in Saudi women.

作者信息

Alkushi Abdulmohsen

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2009;2(3):394-8. doi: 10.1016/s1658-3876(09)50007-6.

DOI:10.1016/s1658-3876(09)50007-6
PMID:20139052
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Analysis of immunohistochemical expression of a large number of tumor tissue samples with conventional techniques is costly, tedious and slow. Tissue microarray (TMA) technology can facilitate the sampling of over 500 tumors on a one-glass slide, which then can be analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA in situ hybridization, or immunohistochemistry. We attempted to validate this technique in breast cancer specimens by comparing the staining result obtained by TMA with the conventional whole-section method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty cases of breast cancer of diverse subtypes were used to build a breast cancer biomarker evaluation model. Serial sections of the recipient block were immunostained with a panel of 4 anti- bodies (ER, PR, HER2 and p53). Concordance of immunohistochemical expression between TMA sections and whole-sections was expressed as a kappa statistic.

RESULTS

Target tumors were accurately sampled by two cores in 19 of 26 donor blocks, and by only one core in 5 blocks. Failure to sample tumor was seen in 2 blocks. Concordance between the staining results of TMA and whole sections was good for PR (kappa=0.67) and ER (kappa=0.67) and very good for p53 (kappa=0.91) and HER2 (kappa=0.91), when all the 26 recipient blocks were included. The rate improved to excellent for p53 (kappa=1.0) and did not change for the other markers when concordance analysis was limited to recipient blocks that had been sampled by two cores.

CONCLUSION

TMA is a reliable technique for examining a large set of tumors. It shows immunostaining scores comparable to those obtained by conventional whole-section evaluation in breast cancer. However, some alterations are not detected due to heterogeneity of biomarker expression inherent in these tumors, but this shortfall can be improved.

摘要

背景

采用传统技术对大量肿瘤组织样本进行免疫组化表达分析成本高、操作繁琐且速度慢。组织微阵列(TMA)技术可在一张载玻片上方便地对500多个肿瘤进行取样,随后可通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)、RNA原位杂交或免疫组化进行分析。我们试图通过比较TMA获得的染色结果与传统全切片方法,在乳腺癌标本中验证该技术。

患者与方法

使用80例不同亚型的乳腺癌构建乳腺癌生物标志物评估模型。受体蜡块的连续切片用一组4种抗体(雌激素受体、孕激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体2和p53)进行免疫染色。TMA切片与全切片之间免疫组化表达的一致性用kappa统计量表示。

结果

在26个供体蜡块中,19个蜡块的目标肿瘤通过两个芯准确取样,5个蜡块仅通过一个芯取样。2个蜡块未取到肿瘤样本。当纳入所有26个受体蜡块时,TMA与全切片染色结果之间的一致性对于孕激素受体(kappa = 0.67)和雌激素受体(kappa = 0.67)良好,对于p53(kappa = 0.91)和人表皮生长因子受体2(kappa = 0.91)非常好。当一致性分析仅限于通过两个芯取样的受体蜡块时,p53的一致性率提高到极佳(kappa = 1.0),其他标志物的一致性率没有变化。

结论

TMA是一种用于检测大量肿瘤的可靠技术。它显示的免疫染色评分与乳腺癌传统全切片评估获得的评分相当。然而,由于这些肿瘤固有的生物标志物表达异质性,一些改变未被检测到,但这一不足可以得到改善。

相似文献

1
Validation of tissue microarray biomarker expression of breast carcinomas in Saudi women.沙特女性乳腺癌组织芯片生物标志物表达的验证
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2009;2(3):394-8. doi: 10.1016/s1658-3876(09)50007-6.
2
Immunohistochemistry subtypes (ER/PR/HER) of breast cancer: where do we stand in the West of Saudi Arabia?沙特阿拉伯西部乳腺癌的免疫组织化学亚型(雌激素受体/孕激素受体/人表皮生长因子受体):我们处于什么水平?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(19):8395-400. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.19.8395.
3
Tissue microarray-based immunohistochemical study can significantly underestimate the expression of HER2 and progesterone receptor in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.基于组织芯片的免疫组织化学研究可能会显著低估乳腺导管原位癌中HER2和孕激素受体的表达。
Biotech Histochem. 2011 Oct;86(5):345-50. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2010.502845. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
4
Intratumoral heterogeneity as a source of discordance in breast cancer biomarker classification.肿瘤内异质性作为乳腺癌生物标志物分类不一致的一个来源。
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 28;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0725-1.
5
Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study.雌激素受体、孕激素受体及人表皮生长因子受体2在乳腺癌细针穿刺抽吸细胞块及配对组织学标本中的表达:一项大型回顾性研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Nov;124(11):828-835. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21745. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
6
Feasibility of using tissue microarrays for the assessment of HER-2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma.利用组织微阵列通过荧光原位杂交评估乳腺癌中HER-2基因扩增的可行性。
Diagn Mol Pathol. 2004 Dec;13(4):213-6. doi: 10.1097/01.pdm.0000140195.05428.1d.
7
Tissue microarrays compared with whole sections and biochemical analyses. A subgroup analysis of DBCG 82 b&c.组织微阵列与全切片及生化分析的比较。丹麦乳腺癌协作组82 b&c的亚组分析。
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(4):591-9. doi: 10.1080/02841860701851871.
8
Validation of tissue microarray technology in endometrioid cancer of the endometrium.组织芯片技术在子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌中的验证
J Clin Pathol. 2007 May;60(5):500-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.040170. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
9
Prognostic value of phosphorylated HER2 in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab.磷酸化HER2在接受辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗的HER2阳性乳腺癌患者中的预后价值。
Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):292-9. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0478-y. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
10
Breast Biomarkers-Comparison on Whole Section and Tissue Microarray Section.乳腺生物标志物——全切片与组织微阵列切片的比较
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):EC40-EC44. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25088.9573. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
COL6A1 promotes metastasis and predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.COL6A1 促进胰腺癌转移并预测不良预后。
Int J Oncol. 2019 Aug;55(2):391-404. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4825. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
2
Breast Biomarkers-Comparison on Whole Section and Tissue Microarray Section.乳腺生物标志物——全切片与组织微阵列切片的比较
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):EC40-EC44. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25088.9573. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer.
组织取样对乳腺癌中Ki67免疫组化评估准确性的影响。
Diagn Pathol. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13000-016-0525-z.
4
Ki67 expression in breast cancer. Correlation with prognostic markers and clinicopathological parameters in Saudi patients.乳腺癌中Ki67的表达。沙特患者中与预后标志物及临床病理参数的相关性
Saudi Med J. 2016 Feb;37(2):137-41. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.2.12285.
5
Tissue microarray-based evaluation of Chromatin Assembly Factor-1 (CAF-1)/p60 as tumour prognostic marker.基于组织芯片对染色质组装因子-1(CAF-1)/p60作为肿瘤预后标志物的评估
Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(9):11044-11062. doi: 10.3390/ijms130911044. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
6
Tissue microarray construction for salivary gland tumors study.唾液腺肿瘤研究中的组织微阵列构建。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jan 1;18(1):e1-6. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18204.