Centre for Integrated Healthcare Research, Queen Margaret University, Musselburgh, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Jul-Aug;45(4):397-410. doi: 10.3109/13682820903105137.
The relationship between mental health, behaviour and language development is widely recognized in the literature. Recent advances in assessment tools allows one to consider the role of pragmatic language skills in this co-occurrence.
This pilot study aimed to investigate (1) the level of association between pragmatic language difficulties and emotional/behavioural difficulties; and (2) what explanations there might there be for any such association. The roles of language, word decoding, and non-verbal cognitive ability and also socio-demographic factors are considered.
METHOD & PROCEDURES: Seventeen participants aged 7-11 years were identified from Educational Psychologist caseloads as having behaviour that is causing concern at school. Comparisons were made with 16 age- and sex-matched controls. Participants' language, literacy and non-verbal cognitive ability were assessed at school. Parents and teachers completed questionnaires investigating communication skills, behaviour and emotional wellbeing.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the groups for non-verbal cognitive ability. However, children in the referred group were significantly more likely to have structural language, word decoding and pragmatic language difficulties and mothers with no further education beyond school. Taking a broad view of language skills to include structural language, pragmatic language and word decoding, 94% (n = 15) of referred children had significant difficulties with at least one of these three factors. The only factor not found on its own was structural language difficulties, indicating that on their own they are perhaps not associated with emotional/behavioural difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The results of this pilot study have implications for how we view language and behaviour difficulties in primary schools. Future larger-scale research should consider the role of parenting factors, pragmatic language skills and literacy ability in the high co-existence rate of emotional/behavioural difficulties and language/communication needs.
心理健康、行为和语言发展之间的关系在文献中得到广泛认可。最近评估工具的进步使得人们能够考虑语用语言技能在这种共同发生中的作用。
本初步研究旨在调查:(1)语用语言困难与情绪/行为困难之间的关联程度;(2) 可能存在的任何关联的解释。考虑了语言、单词解码和非言语认知能力以及社会人口因素的作用。
从教育心理学家的案例中确定了 17 名年龄在 7-11 岁之间的参与者,他们在学校的行为引起了关注。将他们与 16 名年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行比较。在学校评估参与者的语言、读写和非言语认知能力。家长和教师完成了调查沟通技巧、行为和情绪健康的问卷。
两组之间的非言语认知能力没有显著差异。然而,被 referral 组的儿童更有可能存在结构语言、单词解码和语用语言困难,并且母亲的教育程度低于学校。从广义上看语言技能,包括结构语言、语用语言和单词解码,94%(n=15)的被 referral 儿童在这三个因素中的至少一个方面存在显著困难。唯一没有单独发现的因素是结构语言困难,这表明它们本身可能与情绪/行为困难无关。
本初步研究的结果对我们如何看待小学的语言和行为困难具有启示意义。未来更大规模的研究应考虑教养因素、语用语言技能和读写能力在情绪/行为困难和语言/交流需求高共存率中的作用。