• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对6784名丹麦人进行的为期五年的前瞻性研究(Inter99)对用于评估2型糖尿病风险的多标志物模型的验证。

Validation of a multimarker model for assessing risk of type 2 diabetes from a five-year prospective study of 6784 Danish people (Inter99).

作者信息

Urdea Mickey, Kolberg Janice, Wilber Judith, Gerwien Robert, Moler Edward, Rowe Michael, Jorgensen Paul, Hansen Torben, Pedersen Oluf, Jørgensen Torben, Borch-Johnsen Knut

机构信息

Tethys Bioscience, Emeryville, California 94608, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;3(4):748-55. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300422.

DOI:10.1177/193229680900300422
PMID:20144324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2769937/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improved identification of subjects at high risk for development of type 2 diabetes would allow preventive interventions to be targeted toward individuals most likely to benefit. In previous research, predictive biomarkers were identified and used to develop multivariate models to assess an individual's risk of developing diabetes. Here we describe the training and validation of the PreDx Diabetes Risk Score (DRS) model in a clinical laboratory setting using baseline serum samples from subjects in the Inter99 cohort, a population-based primary prevention study of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Among 6784 subjects free of diabetes at baseline, 215 subjects progressed to diabetes (converters) during five years of follow-up. A nested case-control study was performed using serum samples from 202 converters and 597 randomly selected nonconverters. Samples were randomly assigned to equally sized training and validation sets. Seven biomarkers were measured using assays developed for use in a clinical reference laboratory.

RESULTS

The PreDx DRS model performed better on the training set (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.837) than fasting plasma glucose alone (AUC = 0.779). When applied to the sequestered validation set, the PreDx DRS showed the same performance (AUC = 0.838), thus validating the model. This model had a better AUC than any other single measure from a fasting sample. Moreover, the model provided further risk stratification among high-risk subpopulations with impaired fasting glucose or metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

The PreDx DRS provides the absolute risk of diabetes conversion in five years for subjects identified to be "at risk" using the clinical factors.

摘要

背景

更好地识别2型糖尿病发病高危人群,将有助于针对最可能受益的个体进行预防性干预。在以往研究中,已确定了预测生物标志物,并用于建立多变量模型以评估个体患糖尿病的风险。在此,我们描述了PreDx糖尿病风险评分(DRS)模型在临床实验室环境中的训练和验证情况,该模型使用了来自Inter99队列研究对象的基线血清样本,这是一项基于人群的心血管疾病一级预防研究。

方法

在6784名基线时无糖尿病的研究对象中,有215名在五年随访期间进展为糖尿病(转变者)。采用巢式病例对照研究,使用了202名转变者和597名随机选择的未转变者的血清样本。样本被随机分配到大小相等的训练集和验证集。使用为临床参考实验室开发的检测方法测量了七种生物标志物。

结果

PreDx DRS模型在训练集上的表现(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.837)优于单独的空腹血糖(AUC=0.779)。当应用于隔离的验证集时,PreDx DRS表现出相同的性能(AUC=0.838),从而验证了该模型。该模型的AUC比空腹样本中的任何其他单一指标都要好。此外,该模型在空腹血糖受损或患有代谢综合征的高危亚人群中提供了进一步的风险分层。

结论

PreDx DRS为使用临床因素确定为“有风险”的研究对象提供了五年内糖尿病转变的绝对风险。

相似文献

1
Validation of a multimarker model for assessing risk of type 2 diabetes from a five-year prospective study of 6784 Danish people (Inter99).一项针对6784名丹麦人进行的为期五年的前瞻性研究(Inter99)对用于评估2型糖尿病风险的多标志物模型的验证。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;3(4):748-55. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300422.
2
Development of a type 2 diabetes risk model from a panel of serum biomarkers from the Inter99 cohort.基于Inter99队列的一组血清生物标志物开发2型糖尿病风险模型。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1207-12. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1935.
3
Validation of a multi-marker model for the prediction of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: combined results of the Inter99 and Botnia studies.多标志物模型预测 2 型糖尿病发病风险的验证:Inter99 和 Botnia 研究的联合结果。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2012 Jan;9(1):59-67. doi: 10.1177/1479164111424762. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
Comparison of accuracy of diabetes risk score and components of the metabolic syndrome in assessing risk of incident type 2 diabetes in Inter99 cohort.比较糖尿病风险评分和代谢综合征成分在评估 Inter99 队列中 2 型糖尿病发病风险方面的准确性。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022863. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
5
Biomarkers in Type 2 diabetes: improving risk stratification with the PreDx ® Diabetes Risk Score.2 型糖尿病的生物标志物:使用 PreDx ® 糖尿病风险评分改善风险分层。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011 Nov;11(8):775-92. doi: 10.1586/erm.11.63.
6
Comparing incident diabetes as defined by fasting plasma glucose or by HbA(1c). The AusDiab, Inter99 and DESIR studies.比较基于空腹血糖或糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))定义的新发糖尿病。AusDiab、Inter99 和 DESIR 研究。
Diabet Med. 2011 Nov;28(11):1311-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03403.x.
7
Clinical and metabolomic predictors of regression to normoglycemia in a population at intermediate cardiometabolic risk.临床和代谢组学预测因素可预测处于中等心血管代谢风险人群的血糖正常化逆转。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Feb 27;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01246-1.
8
HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and the prediction of diabetes: Inter99, AusDiab and D.E.S.I.R.糖化血红蛋白、空腹血浆葡萄糖与糖尿病预测:Inter99、AusDiab 和 D.E.S.I.R.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;96(3):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
9
Development and validation of QDiabetes-2018 risk prediction algorithm to estimate future risk of type 2 diabetes: cohort study.用于估计2型糖尿病未来风险的QDiabetes-2018风险预测算法的开发与验证:队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Nov 20;359:j5019. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5019.
10
[Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score with metabolic risk factors for type 2 diabetes].[德国2型糖尿病风险评分与代谢风险因素的验证]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Apr;133(17):878-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1075664.

引用本文的文献

1
Agreement between Type 2 Diabetes Risk Scales in a Caucasian Population: A Systematic Review and Report.白种人群中2型糖尿病风险评估量表的一致性:系统评价与报告
J Clin Med. 2020 May 20;9(5):1546. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051546.
2
Postprandial metabolite profiles associated with type 2 diabetes clearly stratify individuals with impaired fasting glucose.与2型糖尿病相关的餐后代谢谱能明确区分空腹血糖受损的个体。
Metabolomics. 2018;14(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s11306-017-1307-7. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
3
Towards the Future Development of an Electrochemical Continuous Multimarker Biosensor for Enhanced Glycemic Management.迈向用于强化血糖管理的电化学连续多标记物生物传感器的未来发展。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):1053-1054. doi: 10.1177/1932296817707543. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Glycated lysine-141 in haptoglobin improves the diagnostic accuracy for type 2 diabetes mellitus in combination with glycated hemoglobin HbA and fasting plasma glucose.结合珠蛋白中糖化的赖氨酸-141与糖化血红蛋白HbA和空腹血糖一起可提高2型糖尿病的诊断准确性。
Clin Proteomics. 2017 Mar 28;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s12014-017-9145-1. eCollection 2017.
5
An exploratory retrospective assessment of a quantitative measure of diabetes risk: medical management and patient impact in a primary care setting.一项关于糖尿病风险定量测量的探索性回顾性评估:初级保健环境中的医疗管理及患者影响
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015 Sep 18;8:447-53. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S78810. eCollection 2015.
6
Understanding the economic value of molecular diagnostic tests: case studies and lessons learned.理解分子诊断测试的经济价值:案例研究与经验教训。
J Pers Med. 2013 Oct 25;3(4):288-305. doi: 10.3390/jpm3040288.
7
Measurement of Lens Autofluorescence Can Distinguish Subjects With Diabetes From Those Without.晶状体自发荧光测量可区分糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jan;8(1):43-49. doi: 10.1177/1932296813516955. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
8
Use of the DISST model to estimate the HOMA and Matsuda indexes using only a basal insulin assay.使用DISST模型仅通过基础胰岛素检测来估算HOMA和松田指数。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):815-20. doi: 10.1177/1932296814532490. Epub 2014 May 12.
9
A novel fasting blood test for insulin resistance and prediabetes.一种用于检测胰岛素抵抗和糖尿病前期的新型空腹血液检测方法。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 1;7(1):100-10. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700112.
10
Performance of a multi-marker diabetes risk score in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS), a multi-ethnic US cohort.多标志物糖尿病风险评分在胰岛素抵抗动脉粥样硬化研究(IRAS)中的表现,这是一个多民族的美国队列研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Sep;28(6):519-26. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2305.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomarkers in fasting serum to estimate glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion.空腹血清标志物评估葡萄糖耐量、胰岛素敏感性和胰岛素分泌。
Clin Chem. 2011 Feb;57(2):326-37. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.156133. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
2
Development of a type 2 diabetes risk model from a panel of serum biomarkers from the Inter99 cohort.基于Inter99队列的一组血清生物标志物开发2型糖尿病风险模型。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1207-12. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1935.
3
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2009》
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13-61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S013.
4
Relation between fasting glucose and retinopathy for diagnosis of diabetes: three population-based cross-sectional studies.空腹血糖与视网膜病变在糖尿病诊断中的关系:三项基于人群的横断面研究。
Lancet. 2008 Mar 1;371(9614):736-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60343-8.
5
Retinopathy, plasma glucose, and the diagnosis of diabetes.视网膜病变、血糖与糖尿病的诊断
Lancet. 2008 Mar 1;371(9614):700-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60318-9.
6
Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study.中年成年人新发糖尿病的预测:弗雷明汉后代研究
Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 28;167(10):1068-74. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.10.1068.
7
What is the best predictor of future type 2 diabetes?未来2型糖尿病的最佳预测指标是什么?
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1544-8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1331. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
8
Etiology of insulin resistance.胰岛素抵抗的病因
Am J Med. 2006 May;119(5 Suppl 1):S10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.01.009.
9
Family physician's knowledge, beliefs, and self-reported practice patterns regarding hyperlipidemia: a National Research Network (NRN) survey.家庭医生关于高脂血症的知识、信念及自我报告的实践模式:一项国家研究网络(NRN)调查
J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):46-53. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.1.46.
10
Type 2 diabetes-a matter of beta-cell life and death?2型糖尿病——β细胞生死攸关的问题?
Science. 2005 Jan 21;307(5708):380-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1104345.