Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Feb;86(1012):106-15. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.089391.
Staging for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires accurate assessment of the mediastinal lymph nodes which determines treatment and outcome. As radiological staging is limited by its specificity and sensitivity, it is necessary to sample the mediastinal nodes. Traditionally, mediastinoscopy has been used for evaluation of the mediastinum especially when radical treatment is contemplated, although conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has also been used in other situations for staging and diagnostic purposes. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) offers a minimally invasive alternative to mediastinoscopy with additional access to the hilar nodes, a better safety profile, and it removes the costs and hazards of theatre time and general anaesthesia with comparable sensitivity, although the negative predictive value of mediastinoscopy (and sample size) is greater. EBUS-TBNA also obtains larger samples than conventional TBNA, has superior performance and theoretically is safer, allowing real-time sampling under direct vision. It can also have predictive value both in sonographic appearance of the nodes and histological characteristics. EBUS-TBNA is therefore indicated for NSCLC staging, diagnosis of lung cancer when there is no endobronchial lesion, and diagnosis of both benign (especially tuberculosis and sarcoidosis) and malignant mediastinal lesions. The procedure is different than for flexible bronchoscopy, takes longer, and requires more training. EBUS-TBNA is more expensive than conventional TBNA but can save costs by reducing the number of more costly mediastinoscopies. Revenue based tariff systems have been slow to reflect the innovation of techniques such as EBUS-TBNA. In the future, endobronchial ultrasound may have applications in airways disease and pulmonary vascular disease.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的分期需要准确评估纵隔淋巴结,这决定了治疗和预后。由于影像学分期的特异性和敏感性有限,因此有必要对纵隔淋巴结进行取样。传统上,纵隔镜检查用于评估纵隔,特别是在考虑根治性治疗时,尽管传统的经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)也用于其他情况下的分期和诊断目的。经支气管超声引导下经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)为纵隔镜检查提供了一种微创替代方法,还可以额外进入肺门淋巴结,具有更好的安全性,并且具有可比性消除了手术室时间和全身麻醉的成本和危害,尽管纵隔镜检查的阴性预测值(和样本量)更大。EBUS-TBNA 还比传统的 TBNA 获得更大的样本,具有更高的性能,并且理论上更安全,可以在直视下实时采样。它还可以对淋巴结的超声表现和组织学特征具有预测价值。因此,EBUS-TBNA 适用于 NSCLC 分期、无支气管内病变时的肺癌诊断以及良性(尤其是结核病和结节病)和恶性纵隔病变的诊断。该程序与纤维支气管镜检查不同,需要更长的时间,并且需要更多的培训。EBUS-TBNA 比传统的 TBNA 更昂贵,但通过减少更昂贵的纵隔镜检查次数可以节省成本。基于收入的计费系统对 EBUS-TBNA 等技术的创新反应缓慢。将来,支气管内超声可能会在气道疾病和肺血管疾病中得到应用。