Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Sungnam, Korea.
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1307-14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1903. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
PURPOSE: The ISTANA (IRESSA as Second-line Therapy in Advanced NSCLC-KoreA) study compared gefitinib with docetaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial of gefitinib (250 mg/d) versus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with one previous platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients (male, 62%; never smoker, 41%; adenocarcinoma, 68%) were enrolled. Progression-free survival was longer for gefitinib compared with docetaxel (hazard ratio, 0.729; 90% confidence interval, 0.533-0.998; one-sided P = 0.0441). Gefitinib significantly improved objective response rate (28.1% versus 7.6%; two-sided P = 0.0007). In the final analysis of overall survival, the hazard ratio was 0.870 (95% confidence interval, 0.613-1.236; two-sided P = 0.4370). No significant differences were seen in the quality of life or symptom improvement rates between the two treatment groups. Gefitinib was well tolerated, was consistent with previous data and disease, and had fewer serious adverse events and fewer Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or 4 adverse events than docetaxel. The incidence of interstitial lung disease-type events was 3.7% (n = 3) with gefitinib and 3.9% (n = 3) with docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was longer with gefitinib than docetaxel, and the secondary endpoints showed superior objective response rate, good tolerability, and similar quality of life improvement rates for gefitinib than docetaxel. Therefore, gefitinib is an important valid treatment option for second-line therapy for Korean NSCLC patients.
目的:ISTANA(IRESSA 作为晚期 NSCLC-韩国二线治疗)研究比较了吉非替尼与多西他赛在铂类化疗预处理的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效。 实验设计:我们进行了一项多中心、随机、开放标签的 III 期临床试验,比较了吉非替尼(250mg/d)与多西他赛(75mg/m²,每 3 周 1 次)在铂类化疗预处理的晚期或转移性 NSCLC 患者中的疗效。主要终点是无进展生存期。 结果:共纳入 161 例患者(男性,62%;从不吸烟者,41%;腺癌,68%)。吉非替尼组的无进展生存期长于多西他赛组(风险比,0.729;90%置信区间,0.533-0.998;单侧 P=0.0441)。吉非替尼显著提高了客观缓解率(28.1% vs. 7.6%;双侧 P=0.0007)。在总生存期的最终分析中,风险比为 0.870(95%置信区间,0.613-1.236;双侧 P=0.4370)。两组间生活质量或症状改善率无显著差异。吉非替尼耐受性良好,与既往数据和疾病一致,且严重不良事件发生率和 CTCAE 3 或 4 级不良事件发生率均低于多西他赛。吉非替尼组间质性肺病样事件发生率为 3.7%(n=3),多西他赛组为 3.9%(n=3)。 结论:无进展生存期是吉非替尼优于多西他赛的主要终点,次要终点显示吉非替尼的客观缓解率更高,耐受性更好,生活质量改善率与多西他赛相似。因此,吉非替尼是韩国 NSCLC 患者二线治疗的重要有效治疗选择。