Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器和射频导管消融时代致心律失常性右室心肌病的临床病程

Clinical course of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in the era of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and radiofrequency catheter ablation.

作者信息

Komura Masatoshi, Suzuki Jun-Ichi, Adachi Susumu, Takahashi Atsushi, Otomo Kenichiro, Nitta Junichi, Nishizaki Mitsuhiro, Obayashi Tohru, Nogami Akihiko, Satoh Yasuhiro, Okishige Kaoru, Hachiya Hitoshi, Hirao Kenzo, Isobe Mitsuaki

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital.

出版信息

Int Heart J. 2010 Jan;51(1):34-40. doi: 10.1536/ihj.51.34.

Abstract

This study investigated the clinical course of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients and in particular evaluated the contribution of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to the treatment of ARVC. ARVC is a myocardial disorder and a cause of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachycardia (VT). Little is known about its prognosis in Japanese ARVC patients. Thirty-five ARVC patients were studied. Mean age of patients whose onset of ARVC was congestive heart failure (CHF) (66.0 +/- 4.0 years) was significantly higher than those whose onset was VT (44.5 +/- 14.8 years, P < 0.05). ARVC patients with CHF onset showed significantly higher death rates compared to those with VT onset. ICD treatment significantly reduced episodes of hospitalization due to VT (0.1 +/- 0.4 episodes) in comparison to treatment by RFCA (1.7 +/- 2.2 episodes, P < 0.03). RFCA treatment did not reduce recurrence of VT in the follow-up period. ICD therapy showed comparable mortality to RFCA treatment. The prognosis of ARVC with CHF onset is poor. ICD therapy significantly reduced hospitalization due to VT compared with RFCA treatment. ICD implantation in combination with medication may be a better treatment for ARVC.

摘要

本研究调查了致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)患者的临床病程,尤其评估了射频导管消融术(RFCA)和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)对ARVC治疗的作用。ARVC是一种心肌疾病,是室性心动过速(VT)导致心源性猝死的原因之一。对于日本ARVC患者的预后知之甚少。对35例ARVC患者进行了研究。以充血性心力衰竭(CHF)为ARVC发病表现的患者平均年龄(66.0±4.0岁)显著高于以VT为发病表现的患者(44.5±14.8岁,P<0.05)。与以VT为发病表现的患者相比,以CHF为发病表现的ARVC患者死亡率显著更高。与RFCA治疗(1.7±2.2次)相比,ICD治疗显著降低了因VT导致的住院次数(0.1±0.4次,P<0.03)。RFCA治疗在随访期内未降低VT的复发率。ICD治疗与RFCA治疗的死亡率相当。以CHF为发病表现的ARVC预后较差。与RFCA治疗相比,ICD治疗显著降低了因VT导致的住院率。ICD植入联合药物治疗可能是ARVC更好的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验