相似文献
1
Comparison of Ki-67 and tritiated thymidine in measuring tumor proliferation.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Apr;95(4):602. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/95.4.602.
2
Thymidine labeling index versus Ki-67.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Apr;95(4):602-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/95.4.602b.
3
A closer look at the cell cycle.
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1993;422(5):341-3. doi: 10.1007/BF01605450.
4
Factors relating to the use of tritiated thymidine in the autoradiographic interpretation of tumor proliferation.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1970 Jan;29(1):120-9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(70)90418-4.
5
Little missed markers and Ki-67.
Lab Invest. 1993 Jun;68(6):597-9.
6
7
[A simple method for flow cytometric measurement of Ki-67 reactive antigen on small solid tissues].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1993 Apr;20(6):737-40.
8
A method for measuring lymphocyte proliferation in mixed lymphocyte cultures using a nuclear proliferation antigen, Ki-67, and flow cytometry.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1989 Apr;91(4):417-21. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/91.4.417.
9
Ki-67 labeling index is a more reliable measure of solid tumor proliferative activity than tritiated thymidine labeling.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1990 Aug;94(2):192-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/94.2.192.
10
Bone marrow tissue and proliferation markers: results and general problems.
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1993;423(6):409-16. doi: 10.1007/BF01606529.
Zotero 插件