Division of Orthopedics, Surgical Department, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Pan-Chiao, Taipei, Taiwan.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Jul;18(7):934-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1066-8. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
The subvastus and midvastus approaches are two of the most commonly performed quadriceps preserving approaches for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can hasten functional recovery and rehabilitation. However, there has not been sufficient investigation with respect to a quantitative comparison between the two approaches in terms of muscle strength. To compare outcomes with respect to muscle strength between these two approaches, quadriceps and hamstring muscle torques of 20 patients who underwent primary TKA with the subvastus (SV) approach and 10 patients who received the midvastus (MV) approach were measured after surgery. The median age of patients in the SV group (68 years, range 53-77 years) was significantly different that the median age of patients in the MV group (61 years, range 50-73 years) (P = 0.0141). There was no significant difference in patient weight, height, or postoperative duration before muscle testing between the SV and MV groups. There were no significant differences in peak muscle torque or hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio between the groups. We thus conclude peak muscle torque and H/Q ratios were not statistically different with the SV or MV approach, therefore functional outcome is comparable.
股四头肌下入路和股中间肌下入路是全膝关节置换术(TKA)中最常采用的两种保留股四头肌的入路方法,这两种方法可以加速功能恢复和康复。然而,对于这两种方法在肌肉力量方面的定量比较,还没有足够的研究。为了比较这两种方法在肌肉力量方面的结果,我们测量了接受股四头肌下入路(SV)和股中间肌下入路(MV)的 20 例初次 TKA 患者的股四头肌和腘绳肌扭矩。SV 组患者的中位年龄(68 岁,范围 53-77 岁)与 MV 组患者的中位年龄(61 岁,范围 50-73 岁)有显著差异(P=0.0141)。SV 组和 MV 组在肌肉测试前的患者体重、身高或术后持续时间方面无显著差异。两组间峰值肌肉扭矩或腘绳肌/股四头肌(H/Q)比值无显著差异。因此,我们得出结论,SV 或 MV 入路的峰值肌肉扭矩和 H/Q 比值没有统计学差异,因此功能结果是可比的。