文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

980纳米腔内激光消融术和分段射频消融术治疗静脉曲张后的疼痛:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Pain following 980-nm endovenous laser ablation and segmental radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Shepherd Amanda C, Gohel Manj S, Lim Chung S, Hamish Maher, Davies Alun H

机构信息

Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Apr;44(3):212-6. doi: 10.1177/1538574409359337. Epub 2010 Feb 11.


DOI:10.1177/1538574409359337
PMID:20150227
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain following endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and identify risk factors for increased pain. METHODS: Patients undergoing either segmental RFA (VNUS Closure Fast, VNUS Medical Technologies, San Jose, California) or EVLA (980 nm) for varicose veins completed a preoperative disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire [AVVQ]) and a diary card recording postoperative pain, return to normal activities, and return to work. Median 3- and 10-day pain scores were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 81 patients returned diary cards (RFA = 45, EVLA = 36). Patients receiving RFA reported less postoperative pain than those receiving EVLA at 3 days (14.5 vs 25.8 mm, P = .053, Mann-Whitney U test) and 10 days (13 vs 23.3 mm, P = .014, Mann-Whitney U test) and returned to work earlier than those receiving EVLA (median 5 vs 9 days, P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with segmental RFA had less postoperative pain and returned to work quicker than those treated with EVLA.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估静脉腔内激光消融术(EVLA)和射频消融术(RFA)后的术后疼痛情况,并确定疼痛加剧的风险因素。 方法:接受分段RFA(VNUS闭合快速系统,VNUS医疗技术公司,加利福尼亚州圣何塞)或EVLA(980纳米)治疗静脉曲张的患者完成了术前特定疾病生活质量问卷(阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷[AVVQ])以及记录术后疼痛、恢复正常活动和恢复工作情况的日记卡。计算了术后第3天和第10天的疼痛评分中位数。 结果:共有81名患者返回了日记卡(RFA组45名,EVLA组36名)。接受RFA治疗的患者在术后第3天(14.5对25.8毫米,P = 0.053,曼-惠特尼U检验)和第10天(13对23.3毫米,P = 0.014,曼-惠特尼U检验)报告的术后疼痛少于接受EVLA治疗的患者,且比接受EVLA治疗的患者更早恢复工作(中位数5天对9天,P = 0.022)。 结论:接受分段RFA治疗的患者术后疼痛较少,且比接受EVLA治疗的患者更快恢复工作。

相似文献

[1]
Pain following 980-nm endovenous laser ablation and segmental radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: a prospective observational study.

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010-4

[2]
Randomized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins.

Br J Surg. 2010-6

[3]
Prospective comparative cohort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using radiofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study).

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017-8-24

[4]
Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm).

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010-8

[5]
Postoperative pain and early quality of life after radiofrequency ablation and mechanochemical endovenous ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins.

J Vasc Surg. 2012-11-8

[6]
A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins.

Ann Surg. 2011-12

[7]
A Comparison of 1,470-nm Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins 10 mm or More in Size.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2015-10

[8]
Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins.

Br J Surg. 2008-3

[9]
Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varicose Veins in the Same Patient.

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016-1

[10]
Comparison of 12-w versus 14-w endovenous laser ablation in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: 5-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Venous Insufficiency: Endovascular and Surgical Treatment.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025-3-6

[2]
Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Venous Insufficiency of the Lower Extremities Before and After Endovascular Laser Ablation: A Prospective Pilot Study Using the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire 20 (CIVIQ-20).

Cureus. 2023-7-13

[3]
CASS (CyanoAcrylate closure versus Surgical Stripping for incompetent saphenous veins) study: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes after cyanoacrylate closure and surgical stripping for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.

Trials. 2020-6-3

[4]
Is radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins a valuable option? A systematic review of the literature with a cost analysis.

Can J Surg. 2018-4

[5]
Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varices in the Same Patient.

J Lasers Med Sci. 2017

[6]
Minimally invasive treatments for perforator vein insufficiency.

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016-12

[7]
ClariVein® - Early results from a large single-centre series of mechanochemical endovenous ablation for varicose veins.

Phlebology. 2017-2

[8]
Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation versus RADiOfrequeNcy Ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2014-4-11

[9]
Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2011

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索