• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

980纳米腔内激光消融术和分段射频消融术治疗静脉曲张后的疼痛:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Pain following 980-nm endovenous laser ablation and segmental radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Shepherd Amanda C, Gohel Manj S, Lim Chung S, Hamish Maher, Davies Alun H

机构信息

Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Apr;44(3):212-6. doi: 10.1177/1538574409359337. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1177/1538574409359337
PMID:20150227
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain following endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and identify risk factors for increased pain.

METHODS

Patients undergoing either segmental RFA (VNUS Closure Fast, VNUS Medical Technologies, San Jose, California) or EVLA (980 nm) for varicose veins completed a preoperative disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire [AVVQ]) and a diary card recording postoperative pain, return to normal activities, and return to work. Median 3- and 10-day pain scores were calculated.

RESULTS

In all, 81 patients returned diary cards (RFA = 45, EVLA = 36). Patients receiving RFA reported less postoperative pain than those receiving EVLA at 3 days (14.5 vs 25.8 mm, P = .053, Mann-Whitney U test) and 10 days (13 vs 23.3 mm, P = .014, Mann-Whitney U test) and returned to work earlier than those receiving EVLA (median 5 vs 9 days, P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with segmental RFA had less postoperative pain and returned to work quicker than those treated with EVLA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估静脉腔内激光消融术(EVLA)和射频消融术(RFA)后的术后疼痛情况,并确定疼痛加剧的风险因素。

方法

接受分段RFA(VNUS闭合快速系统,VNUS医疗技术公司,加利福尼亚州圣何塞)或EVLA(980纳米)治疗静脉曲张的患者完成了术前特定疾病生活质量问卷(阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷[AVVQ])以及记录术后疼痛、恢复正常活动和恢复工作情况的日记卡。计算了术后第3天和第10天的疼痛评分中位数。

结果

共有81名患者返回了日记卡(RFA组45名,EVLA组36名)。接受RFA治疗的患者在术后第3天(14.5对25.8毫米,P = 0.053,曼-惠特尼U检验)和第10天(13对23.3毫米,P = 0.014,曼-惠特尼U检验)报告的术后疼痛少于接受EVLA治疗的患者,且比接受EVLA治疗的患者更早恢复工作(中位数5天对9天,P = 0.022)。

结论

接受分段RFA治疗的患者术后疼痛较少,且比接受EVLA治疗的患者更快恢复工作。

相似文献

1
Pain following 980-nm endovenous laser ablation and segmental radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: a prospective observational study.980纳米腔内激光消融术和分段射频消融术治疗静脉曲张后的疼痛:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Apr;44(3):212-6. doi: 10.1177/1538574409359337. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
2
Randomized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins.VNUS ClosureFAST 射频消融与激光治疗静脉曲张的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jun;97(6):810-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7091.
3
Prospective comparative cohort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using radiofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study).前瞻性对比队列研究评估射频分段消融或 1470nm 腔内激光消融联合放射状光纤治疗大隐静脉反流(Varico 2 研究)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Jan;6(1):31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
4
Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm).激光和射频消融研究(LARA 研究):一项比较射频消融和静脉内激光消融(810nm)的随机研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;40(2):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.026.
5
Postoperative pain and early quality of life after radiofrequency ablation and mechanochemical endovenous ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins.射频消融和机械化学静脉内消融治疗功能不全大隐静脉后术后疼痛和早期生活质量。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.049. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins.前瞻性双盲随机对照试验研究射频与激光治疗静脉曲张患者大隐静脉的效果。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):876-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318230af5a.
7
A Comparison of 1,470-nm Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins 10 mm or More in Size.1470纳米腔内激光消融术与射频消融术治疗直径10毫米及以上大隐静脉的比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;29(7):1368-72. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.063. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
8
Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins.比较静脉腔内激光消融术与手术治疗原发性大隐静脉曲张的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2008 Mar;95(3):294-301. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6101.
9
Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varicose Veins in the Same Patient.同一患者接受静脉腔内激光与射频消融治疗静脉曲张的比较。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Jan;50(1):47-51. doi: 10.1177/1538574415625813. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
10
Comparison of 12-w versus 14-w endovenous laser ablation in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: 5-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.12周与14周腔内激光消融治疗大隐静脉曲张的比较:一项随机对照试验的5年结果
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 Jul;47(5):346-52. doi: 10.1177/1538574413487265. Epub 2013 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Venous Insufficiency: Endovascular and Surgical Treatment.静脉功能不全:血管腔内治疗与手术治疗
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Mar 6;27(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02155-x.
2
Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Venous Insufficiency of the Lower Extremities Before and After Endovascular Laser Ablation: A Prospective Pilot Study Using the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire 20 (CIVIQ-20).下肢慢性静脉功能不全患者血管腔内激光消融术前及术后的生活质量:一项使用慢性静脉功能不全生活质量问卷20(CIVIQ - 20)的前瞻性试点研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 13;15(7):e41854. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41854. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
CASS (CyanoAcrylate closure versus Surgical Stripping for incompetent saphenous veins) study: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes after cyanoacrylate closure and surgical stripping for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.
CASS(氰基丙烯酸酯封闭与手术剥脱治疗功能不全大隐静脉)研究:比较氰基丙烯酸酯封闭与手术剥脱治疗功能不全大隐静脉的临床结局的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04393-0.
4
Is radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins a valuable option? A systematic review of the literature with a cost analysis.射频消融治疗静脉曲张是一种有价值的选择吗?一项结合成本分析的文献系统综述。
Can J Surg. 2018 Apr;61(2):128-138. doi: 10.1503/cjs.010114.
5
Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varices in the Same Patient.同一患者静脉内激光与射频消融治疗静脉曲张的比较。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Winter;8(1):13-16. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.03. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
6
Minimally invasive treatments for perforator vein insufficiency.穿支静脉功能不全的微创治疗
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Dec;6(6):593-598. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.11.12.
7
ClariVein® - Early results from a large single-centre series of mechanochemical endovenous ablation for varicose veins.ClariVein®——大型单中心系列机械化学性静脉腔内消融治疗静脉曲张的早期结果。
Phlebology. 2017 Feb;32(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/0268355516630154. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
8
Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation versus RADiOfrequeNcy Ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经皮机械化学静脉消融术与 RADiOfrequeNcy 消融术治疗原发性大隐静脉曲张(MARADONA):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2014 Apr 11;15:121. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-121.
9
Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.静脉曲张的血管内射频消融术:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2011;11(1):1-93. Epub 2011 Feb 1.