King's College Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
BJU Int. 2010 Sep;106(6):816-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09202.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
To determine whether baseline urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes predict the need for increased doses of fesoterodine in patients with overactive bladder (OAB), as clinicians would benefit from data that help to predict which patients require higher doses of antimuscarinics to manage UUI episodes.
In this pooled analysis of data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, patients were randomized to placebo or fesoterodine 4 or 8 mg for 12 weeks and stratified into tertiles (>0-<2, 2-<4, or > or =4) according to the number of UUI episodes/24 h as recorded in 3-day bladder diaries at baseline. The change in mean UUI episodes/24 h from baseline to end of study was assessed using analysis of covariance.
In a post hoc analysis of data from two clinical trials, there were significant reductions from baseline in UUI episodes for fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg vs placebo in patients (n) with >0-<2 (422), 2-<4 (424) and > or =4 (481) UUI episodes at baseline (all P < 0.01). In patients with 2-<4 and > or =4 UUI episodes at baseline, fesoterodine 8 mg gave significantly greater mean reductions (-1.92 and -4.17, respectively) vs fesoterodine 4 mg (-1.43 and -3.31) (P < 0.05). The most common adverse events were dry mouth (placebo, 8%; fesoterodine 4 mg, 19%; and 8 mg, 35%) and constipation (placebo, 2%; fesoterodine 4 mg, 5%; and 8 mg, 6%).
Fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg significantly reduced UUI episodes vs placebo; this effect appeared to be greater with fesoterodine 8 mg in patients with > or =2 UUI episodes/24 h at baseline. Fesoterodine was well tolerated, although higher doses increased the incidence of adverse events. These findings might aid the clinical identification of patients with OAB who would most benefit from increasing the dose of fesoterodine from 4 to 8 mg.
确定基线急迫性尿失禁(UUI)发作是否可预测逼尿过度症(OAB)患者需要增加非索罗定剂量,因为临床医生将受益于有助于预测哪些患者需要更高剂量抗毒蕈碱药物来管理 UUI 发作的数据。
在这两项双盲、安慰剂对照试验数据的汇总分析中,患者随机分配至安慰剂或非索罗定 4 或 8mg 治疗 12 周,并根据基线 3 天膀胱日记中记录的 24 小时 UUI 发作次数/24 小时分成 3 个三分位数(>0-<2、2-<4 或≥4)。使用协方差分析评估从基线到研究结束时 UUI 发作次数/24 小时的平均变化。
在两项临床试验数据的事后分析中,与安慰剂相比,基线时有>0-<2(422 例)、2-<4(424 例)和≥4(481 例)UUI 发作的患者,非索罗定 4mg 和 8mg 治疗后 UUI 发作次数均显著减少(均 P<0.01)。基线时有 2-<4 和≥4 UUI 发作的患者,非索罗定 8mg 治疗的平均减少量显著大于非索罗定 4mg 治疗(分别为-1.92 和-4.17,均 P<0.05)。最常见的不良反应为口干(安慰剂 8%、非索罗定 4mg 19%和 8mg 35%)和便秘(安慰剂 2%、非索罗定 4mg 5%和 8mg 6%)。
非索罗定 4mg 和 8mg 与安慰剂相比均显著减少 UUI 发作;在基线时有≥2 次/24 小时 UUI 发作的患者中,非索罗定 8mg 似乎效果更大。非索罗定耐受性良好,尽管高剂量增加了不良反应的发生率。这些发现可能有助于临床确定最受益于将非索罗定剂量从 4mg 增加至 8mg 的 OAB 患者。