Echocardiography Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Feb;23(2):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.023.
Abnormal cardiac stress imaging findings are not always associated with angiographically significant coronary artery disease. The outcomes of patients with such false-positive findings have not been extensively examined. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with abnormal stress echocardiographic findings who had false-positive results compared with those who had true-positive results.
Of 1,477 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 +/- 12 years; 61% men) with abnormal stress echocardiographic findings who underwent coronary arteriography within 30 days, death from any cause was ascertained.
At coronary arteriography, 997 patients (67.5%) had true-positive results, defined by the presence of angiographically significant coronary artery disease (> or = 50% stenoses), and 480 (32.5%) had false-positive results, defined by <50% stenoses or normal coronary arteries. Of the subgroup of patients with markedly abnormal stress echocardiographic findings (n = 605), 28% had <50% stenoses or normal coronary arteries. During an average follow-up period of 2.4 +/- 1.0 years, there were 140 deaths. The adjusted likelihood of subsequent death for patients with <50% stenoses compared to patients with > or = 50% stenoses after abnormal stress echocardiography was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.31; P = .62).
A sizable proportion of patients with abnormal stress echocardiographic results who are referred for coronary angiography have false-positive findings. The outcomes of patients with false-positive results were similar to those of patients with true-positive results. This finding suggests that patients with false-positive results on stress echocardiography should still receive intensive risk factor management and careful clinical follow-up.
异常的心脏应激成像结果并不总是与血管造影显示的显著冠状动脉疾病相关。对于这些假阳性发现的患者的结局尚未得到广泛研究。本回顾性研究的目的是描述与真正阳性结果相比,应激超声心动图检查结果异常且为假阳性的患者的特征和结局。
在 1477 例连续的应激超声心动图检查结果异常并在 30 天内行冠状动脉造影的患者中,确定任何原因导致的死亡。
在冠状动脉造影中,997 例(67.5%)患者存在真正阳性结果,定义为存在血管造影显示的显著冠状动脉疾病(>或=50%狭窄),480 例(32.5%)患者存在假阳性结果,定义为<50%狭窄或正常冠状动脉。在应激超声心动图检查结果显著异常的患者亚组(n=605)中,28%的患者<50%狭窄或正常冠状动脉。平均 2.4+/-1.0 年的随访期间,有 140 例死亡。应激超声心动图检查后狭窄<50%或正常冠状动脉的患者随后死亡的风险比狭窄>或=50%的患者高 1.05(95%置信区间,0.86-1.31;P=0.62)。
大量因异常应激超声心动图检查结果而行冠状动脉造影的患者存在假阳性发现。假阳性结果患者的结局与真正阳性结果患者的结局相似。这一发现表明,应激超声心动图检查为假阳性的患者仍应接受强化危险因素管理和仔细的临床随访。