• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮芬太尼基质贴片 Matrifen 和 Durogesic DTrans 具有生物等效性。

Transdermal fentanyl matrix patches Matrifen and Durogesic DTrans are bioequivalent.

机构信息

Medical University/AKH, Department of Special Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010 Jun;75(2):225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.02.005
PMID:20152899
Abstract

AIM

The pharmacokinetic profiles of the two commercially available transdermal fentanyl patches Matrifen (100 microg/h) and Durogesic DTrans (100 microg/h), used to manage severe chronic pain, were compared regarding their systemic exposure, rate of absorption, and safety.

METHODS

Transdermal matrix fentanyl patches [Matrifen or Durogesic DTrans (100 microg/h)] were applied for 72 h to 30 healthy male subjects in a randomized, four-period (two replicated treatment sequences), crossover study; 28 subjects completed the study. The pharmacokinetic parameters of fentanyl were determined for 144 h after application using plasma samples. Safety of the patches (adverse events) and performance (adhesion, skin irritation, residual fentanyl content in the patch) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The plasma concentration-time curves of Matrifen (Test) and Durogesic DTrans (Reference) were similar. The geometric least square means of the Test/Reference ratio (90% confidence intervals [CI]) were within the range of 80-125%, demonstrating bioequivalence of Matrifen and Durogesic DTrans: AUC(0-tlast) 92.5 (CI 88.7-96.4), AUC(0-inf) 91.7 (CI 88.0-95.7), and C(max) 98.3 (CI 92.9-104.1). After 72 h application, Matrifen had a more efficient utilization of fentanyl (mean+/-SD 82.3+/-9.43%) than Durogesic DTrans (52.3+/-12.8%), with substantially lower residual fentanyl in patch after use. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed lower intra- and inter-subject variability for Matrifen than for Durogesic DTrans patch.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite different technologies, the transdermal fentanyl patches Matrifen and Durogesic DTrans are bioequivalent. Compared with Durogesic DTrans, the Matrifen patch had lower initial and lower residual fentanyl content, as well as lower intra- and inter-subject variability, allowing reproducible drug delivery and reliable analgesia.

摘要

目的

比较两种市售的芬太尼透皮贴剂(Matrifen 100μg/h 和 Durogesic DTrans 100μg/h)的药代动力学特征,这两种贴剂用于治疗严重慢性疼痛,以评估它们的全身暴露量、吸收速率和安全性。

方法

30 名健康男性受试者被随机分为 4 个周期(2 个重复治疗序列)交叉研究,分别应用芬太尼透皮基质贴剂(Matrifen 或 Durogesic DTrans [100μg/h])72 小时;28 名受试者完成了这项研究。在贴剂应用后 144 小时内使用血浆样本测定芬太尼的药代动力学参数。评估贴剂的安全性(不良反应)和性能(粘贴性、皮肤刺激、贴剂中残留的芬太尼含量)。

结果

Matrifen(试验)和 Durogesic DTrans(参比)的血浆浓度-时间曲线相似。试验/参比比值的几何均数(90%置信区间[CI])在 80-125%范围内,表明 Matrifen 和 Durogesic DTrans 具有生物等效性:AUC(0-tlast)92.5(CI 88.7-96.4)、AUC(0-inf)91.7(CI 88.0-95.7)和 C(max)98.3(CI 92.9-104.1)。应用 72 小时后,Matrifen 比 Durogesic DTrans 更有效地利用芬太尼(平均+/-SD 82.3+/-9.43%),使用后贴剂中残留的芬太尼明显减少。与 Durogesic DTrans 贴剂相比,Matrifen 的药代动力学参数显示出较低的个体内和个体间变异性。

结论

尽管使用了不同的技术,但芬太尼透皮贴剂 Matrifen 和 Durogesic DTrans 具有生物等效性。与 Durogesic DTrans 相比,Matrifen 贴剂初始和残留的芬太尼含量较低,个体内和个体间变异性较低,能够实现可重复的药物输送和可靠的镇痛效果。

相似文献

1
Transdermal fentanyl matrix patches Matrifen and Durogesic DTrans are bioequivalent.经皮芬太尼基质贴片 Matrifen 和 Durogesic DTrans 具有生物等效性。
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010 Jun;75(2):225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
2
Evaluation of the bioequivalence of two transdermal fentanyl systems following single and repeat applications.单次及重复应用后两种透皮芬太尼系统的生物等效性评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Dec;21(12):1961-8. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65259.
3
Pharmacokinetic study between a bilayer matrix fentalyl patch and a monolayer matrix fentanyl patch: single dose administration in healthy volunteers.双层基质芬太尼透皮贴剂与单层基质芬太尼透皮贴剂的药代动力学研究:健康志愿者单剂量给药
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;80(1):110-5. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12595. Epub 2015 May 28.
4
Relative bioavailability of the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FEBT) 1,080 pg versus oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate 1,600 pg and dose proportionality of FEBT 270 to 1,300 microg: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period study in healthy adult volunteers.芬太尼泡腾颊片(FEBT)1080微克与口腔黏膜枸橼酸芬太尼1600微克的相对生物利用度以及FEBT 270至1300微克的剂量比例:一项在健康成年志愿者中进行的单剂量、随机、开放标签、三周期研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.016.
5
Validated GC-MS analysis for the determination of residual fentanyl in applied Durogesic reservoir and Durogesic D-Trans matrix transdermal fentanyl patches.用于测定应用的多瑞吉储库和多瑞吉D-Trans基质透皮芬太尼贴剂中芬太尼残留量的经过验证的气相色谱-质谱联用分析。
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007 Feb 1;846(1-2):264-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
6
Pharmacokinetic properties of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets: a phase I, open-label, crossover study of single-dose 100, 200, 400, and 800 microg in healthy adult volunteers.芬太尼泡腾颊含片的药代动力学特性:一项在健康成年志愿者中进行的单剂量100、200、400和800微克的I期开放标签交叉研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):707-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.015.
7
A comparison of the skin irritation potential of transdermal fentanyl versus transdermal buprenorphine in middle-aged to elderly healthy volunteers.中年至老年健康志愿者中透皮芬太尼与透皮丁丙诺啡皮肤刺激潜力的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Mar;22(3):501-9. doi: 10.1185/030079906X89829.
8
Comparative bioequivalence study between a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl and a commercially available reservoir formulation.芬太尼新型基质透皮给药系统与市售储库制剂的比较生物等效性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;63(1):121-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02758.x. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
9
Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and performance of a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl relative to the commercially available reservoir formulation in healthy subjects.新型芬太尼基质透皮给药系统在健康受试者体内的药代动力学、耐受性及性能与市售储库型制剂的比较
J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;46(6):642-53. doi: 10.1177/0091270006286901.
10
Inter- and intra-individual variability in transdermal fentanyl absorption in cancer pain patients.癌症疼痛患者经皮芬太尼吸收的个体间和个体内变异性。
Oncol Rep. 2005 Oct;14(4):1029-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of changes in skin properties due to diabetes mellitus on the titration period of transdermal fentanyl: single-center retrospective study and diabetic animal model study.糖尿病导致的皮肤特性变化对透皮芬太尼滴定期的影响:单中心回顾性研究及糖尿病动物模型研究
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40780-024-00402-5.
2
Severe and Fatal Fentanyl Poisonings from Transdermal Systems after On-Skin and Ingestion Application.经皮给药系统在皮肤贴敷和口服后导致的严重及致命性芬太尼中毒
Toxics. 2023 Oct 20;11(10):872. doi: 10.3390/toxics11100872.
3
Predicting Transdermal Fentanyl Delivery Using Mechanistic Simulations for Tailored Therapy.
使用机理模拟预测透皮芬太尼给药以实现个体化治疗。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 29;11:585393. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.585393. eCollection 2020.
4
Safety, Tolerability, and Dose Proportionality of a Novel Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix Patch and Bioequivalence With a Matrix Fentanyl Patch: Two Phase 1 Single-Center Open-Label, Randomized Crossover Studies in Healthy Japanese Volunteers.新型经皮芬太尼基质贴片的安全性、耐受性和剂量比例与基质芬太尼贴片的生物等效性:两项在健康日本志愿者中进行的单中心、开放标签、随机交叉的 1 期研究。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Mar;10(3):260-271. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.846. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Treatment with subcutaneous and transdermal fentanyl: results from a population pharmacokinetic study in cancer patients.皮下和透皮芬太尼治疗:癌症患者群体药代动力学研究结果。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;72(4):459-67. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-2005-x. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Pharmacokinetic study between a bilayer matrix fentalyl patch and a monolayer matrix fentanyl patch: single dose administration in healthy volunteers.双层基质芬太尼透皮贴剂与单层基质芬太尼透皮贴剂的药代动力学研究:健康志愿者单剂量给药
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;80(1):110-5. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12595. Epub 2015 May 28.
7
Medication errors related to transdermal opioid patches: lessons from a regional incident reporting system.与透皮阿片类药物贴剂相关的用药错误:来自区域事件报告系统的经验教训。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Jun 9;15:31. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-31.