Suppr超能文献

在妊娠后期肉牛小母牛和哺乳期肉牛小牛肉饲料中使用紫花苜蓿叶粉作为补充饲料。

Using alfalfa leaf meal as a supplement in late-gestation beef heifer and nursing beef calf diets.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St Paul 55108, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2010 Jun;88(6):2132-8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2592. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate using alfalfa leaf meal (ALM; 22% CP, DM basis) in beef cattle diets. In Exp. 1, a total of 24 late-gestation Angus heifers (initial BW 470 +/- 9 kg) were blocked by BW, calving date, and BCS to 1 of 4 dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design. All heifers were offered a basal hay diet (7.4% CP and 67.6% NDF, DM basis). Treatments were arranged as a 2 x 2 factorial consisting of CP supplied at 100 or 112.5% of the recommended daily intake using either soybean meal (SBM) or ALM as the supplemental protein source. Treatments were fed for an average of 100 d before calving. Total DMI was unaffected by supplemental protein source, although heifers consumed more (P < 0.001) ALM supplement than SBM supplement at the expense of hay and corn. Feeding 112.5% of recommended CP to heifers increased precalving rate of BW gain (P = 0.004) and DM digestibility (P = 0.003). Protein source did not affect DM digestibility (P = 0.17). Neither supplemental protein source nor protein amount affected changes in BCS or calving traits. In Exp. 2, replicates of treatments were conducted over 2 consecutive years at 2 locations in northern Minnesota to determine the effects of including ALM in creep-fed supplements on nursing calf performance, supplement BW gain efficiency (GF; BW gain over control/supplement intake), and cow performance. Treatments were control (no supplement), ALM supplement (58% ALM, as-fed basis), or a wheat middling- and soybean hull-based supplement (MIDD). Milk intake (estimated by the weigh-suckle-weigh technique) was similar among treatments. Creep-fed calves had greater (P < 0.001) ADG than control calves, whereas calves offered MIDD tended to have greater ADG (P = 0.05) than those offered ALM (1.38 vs. 1.30 kg/d, respectively). Calves offered MIDD had greater (P < 0.001) creep feed DMI than those offered ALM (2.6 vs. 1.3 kg/d, respectively). A year x treatment interaction was noted for GF (P = 0.02). In yr 1, GF for calves offered ALM was greater (P = 0.006) than GF for calves offered MIDD, but in yr 2, there were no differences. Alfalfa leaf meal may substitute for SBM in beef heifer wintering diets and conventional creep feed ingredients. When included in creep feed diets, ALM can result in slightly less ADG and less DMI, but supplement conversion efficiency may be increased.

摘要

进行了两项实验来研究在肉牛日粮中使用紫花苜蓿叶粉(ALM;CP 含量 22%,DM 基础)。在实验 1 中,总共 24 头后期妊娠的安格斯小母牛(初始 BW 470 +/- 9 kg)按 BW、产犊日期和 BCS 分为 4 种日粮处理的随机完全区组设计的 1 个区组。所有小母牛均提供基础干草日粮(CP 含量为 7.4%,NDF 含量为 67.6%,DM 基础)。处理方案为 2 x 2 因子设计,用大豆粉(SBM)或 ALM 作为补充蛋白源,以 100 或 112.5%的推荐日摄入量供应 CP。处理方案在产犊前平均饲喂 100 d。补充蛋白源对总 DMI 没有影响,但与 SBM 补充料相比,小母牛消耗更多(P < 0.001)的 ALM 补充料,从而减少了干草和玉米的摄入量。给小母牛饲喂 112.5%的推荐 CP 可提高产前 BW 增重率(P = 0.004)和 DM 消化率(P = 0.003)。蛋白源对 DM 消化率没有影响(P = 0.17)。补充蛋白源和蛋白量都不会影响 BCS 或产犊性状的变化。在实验 2 中,在明尼苏达州北部的 2 个地点连续 2 年进行了处理的重复实验,以确定在哺乳期补充料中添加 ALM 对哺乳小牛的性能、补充料 BW 增重效率(GF;BW 增重与对照/补充料摄入量之比)和奶牛性能的影响。处理方案为对照(无补充料)、ALM 补充料(58% ALM,实际基)或小麦中间和大豆壳基补充料(MIDD)。通过称重-吸吮-称重技术估计,所有处理组的牛奶摄入量相似。与对照组相比,哺乳期犊牛的 ADG 更高(P < 0.001),而与 ALM 相比,MIDD 处理组的 ADG 更高(P = 0.05)(分别为 1.38 和 1.30 kg/d)。与 ALM 相比,MIDD 处理组的哺乳期犊牛对 Creep 饲料的采食量更高(P < 0.001)(分别为 2.6 和 1.3 kg/d)。GF 出现了年×处理的交互作用(P = 0.02)。在第 1 年,与 MIDD 相比,ALM 处理组的 GF 更高(P = 0.006),但在第 2 年,无差异。紫花苜蓿叶粉可替代 SBM 用于肉牛小母牛冬季日粮和常规 Creep 饲料成分。当添加到 Creep 饲料日粮中时,ALM 可能会导致 ADG 和采食量略有下降,但补充料转化效率可能会提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验