Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainsville, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):158-67. doi: 10.1080/00223890903510407.
Although conceptualizations of perfectionism have emphasized adaptive as well as maladaptive expressions of the construct, how these different dimensions or types of perfectionists might be reflected in comprehensive personality assessment instruments is unknown. An initial sample of 267 university students completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 2001), Millon Index of Personality Styles Revised (MIPS-R; Millon, 2004), and Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (Slaney, Mobley, Trippi, Ashby, & Johnson, 1996). Analyses indicated that dimensions and types of perfectionism were associated, in expected directions, with select scores on the MMPI-2 and MIPS-R.
尽管完美主义的概念强调了该结构的适应性和不良适应性表达，但这些不同维度或类型的完美主义者如何在综合人格评估工具中得到反映尚不清楚。最初的 267 名大学生完成了明尼苏达多相人格测验-2（MMPI-2；Butcher、Dahlstrom、Graham、Tellegen 和 Kaemmer，2001 年）、米隆人格风格修订指数（MIPS-R；Millon，2004 年）和几乎完美量表修订版（Slaney、Mobley、Trippi、Ashby 和 Johnson，1996 年）。分析表明，完美主义的维度和类型与 MMPI-2 和 MIPS-R 的某些分数呈预期方向相关。
