Suppr超能文献

高剂量与中剂量美沙酮维持治疗:哪种疗效更好?

High dose versus moderate dose methadone maintenance: is there a better outcome?

机构信息

School of Medicine, Emory University, Decatur, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Addict Dis. 2009 Oct;28(4):399-405. doi: 10.1080/10550880903183042.

Abstract

Methadone dosing has been an issue of controversy among clinicians for a long time. Few recent studies reported that doses above 100 mg daily seem promising in better control of illicit opiate use for some patients, but more research is needed to support that notion. A retrospective chart review for patients maintained on methadone at Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients on a methadone dose of 60 to 100 mg daily (n = 34) and patients on a methadone dose greater than 100 mg daily (n = 25). Those charts were compared for urine drug screens for opiates and cocaine (first four from admission and most recent four screens), retention or drop out from the program, and Addiction Severity Index (ASI) composite score at admission and most recent score. The results of the first and last four urine drug screens for opiates showed that the moderate dose group was positive 23% and 17%, respectively. However, the high dose group was positive 14% and 8%, respectively. These results showed statistical significance (Chi-Square = 8.04, df = 3 and p =.03). ASI scores for drugs did not show statistically significant improvement for the moderate dose group (p =.19) but showed statistically significant improvement for the high dose group (p =.0002) when the result of the first and last ASI scores among each group were compared. The ASI scores for family problems showed statistically significant improvement for the moderate dose group (p =.03). High doses of methadone greater than 100 mg daily may provide a better outcome for illicit opiate use among some patients who would not respond to moderate doses.

摘要

美沙酮的剂量一直是临床医生争论的一个问题。最近的一些研究报告称,对于一些患者来说,每天剂量超过 100 毫克似乎可以更好地控制非法阿片类药物的使用,但需要更多的研究来支持这一观点。对亚特兰大退伍军人事务医疗中心接受美沙酮维持治疗的患者进行了回顾性图表审查。患者分为两组:每天接受 60 至 100 毫克美沙酮剂量的患者(n = 34)和每天接受超过 100 毫克美沙酮剂量的患者(n = 25)。比较了这两组患者的尿液药物筛查结果(入院时的前四个和最近的四个药物筛查)、保留或退出该项目以及入院时和最近一次的成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)综合评分。阿片类药物的第一次和最后四次尿液药物筛查结果显示,中剂量组分别呈阳性 23%和 17%。然而,高剂量组分别呈阳性 14%和 8%。这些结果具有统计学意义(卡方=8.04,df=3,p=.03)。中剂量组的药物 ASI 评分没有显示出统计学上的显著改善(p=.19),但当比较每组第一次和最后一次 ASI 评分的结果时,高剂量组的药物 ASI 评分显示出统计学上的显著改善(p=.0002)。中剂量组的家庭问题 ASI 评分显示出统计学上的显著改善(p=.03)。对于一些对中等剂量无反应的患者,每天服用超过 100 毫克的大剂量美沙酮可能会提供更好的非法阿片类药物使用结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验