Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, DPO AA 34002-9998.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 2;107(9):4242-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911637107. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
Seed size commonly varies by five to six orders of magnitude among coexisting plant species, a pattern ecologists have long sought to explain. Because seed size trades off with seed number, small-seeded species clearly have the advantage in fecundity, but what is the countervailing advantage of large seeds? Higher competitive ability combined with strong competitive asymmetry can in theory allow coexistence through a competition-colonization trade-off, but empirical evidence is inconsistent with this mechanism. Instead, the key advantage of large seeds appears to be their tolerance of stresses such as shade or drought that are present in some but not all regeneration sites. Here I present a simple, analytically tractable model of species coexistence in heterogeneous habitats through a tolerance-fecundity trade-off. Under this mechanism, the more tolerant species win all of the more stressful regeneration sites and some of those that are less stressful, whereas the more fecund species win most but not all of the less stressful sites. The tolerance-fecundity trade-off enables stable coexistence of large numbers of species in models with and without seed limitation. The tolerance-fecundity mechanism provides an excellent explanation for the maintenance of diversity of seed size within plant communities and also suggests new hypotheses for coexistence in animal and microbial communities.
种子大小在共存的植物物种之间通常相差五到六个数量级,生态学家长期以来一直试图解释这种模式。因为种子大小与种子数量成反比,小种子物种显然在繁殖力上具有优势,但大种子的抗衡优势是什么?更高的竞争力加上强烈的竞争不对称性,理论上可以通过竞争-殖民权衡来允许共存,但实证证据与这种机制不一致。相反,大种子的主要优势似乎是它们对某些但不是所有再生地点存在的遮荫或干旱等压力的耐受性。在这里,我通过耐受性-繁殖力权衡提出了一种简单的、可分析处理的异质生境中物种共存的模型。根据这种机制,耐受性更强的物种赢得所有更具压力的再生地点和一些压力较小的地点,而繁殖力更强的物种赢得大多数但不是所有压力较小的地点。耐受性-繁殖力权衡使具有和不具有种子限制的模型中大量物种能够稳定共存。耐受性-繁殖力机制为植物群落中种子大小多样性的维持提供了极好的解释,也为动物和微生物群落中的共存提供了新的假说。