Duncan W C, Barbato G, Fagioli I, Garcia-Borreguero D, Wehr T A
Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Arch Ital Biol. 2009 Dec;147(4):117-30.
Twenty-four hour sleep patterns were measured in six healthy male volunteers during a 90-minute short sleep-wake (SW 30:60) cycle protocol for 48 hours. Sleep pressure estimates (amount of Slow Wave Sleep [SWS], SWA, and Rate of Synchronization [RoS: the rate of SWA build-up at the beginning of the NREM period]) were compared with the 24-hour patterns of body temperature (Tb24) and sleep propensity. A moderate sleep debt was incurred over the 48 hour study as indicated by decreased levels of 24 hour sleep. On day 1, ultradian patterns of REM and SWS sleep were prominent; on day 2, more prominent were circadian patterns of REM sleep, SWS, Sleep Latency, TST and Tb24. Also on Day 2, biphasic patterns of SWA and RoS were expressed, with peaks occurring during the falling and rising limbs of Tb24. The biphasic peaks in SWA and RoS may be associated with phase-specific interactions of the circadian pacemaker with the sleep homeostat during conditions of moderate sleep pressure. Further research is needed to replicate the finding and to identify biological factors that may underlie the twelve hour pattern in SWA.
在一项为期48小时的90分钟短睡眠-清醒(SW 30:60)周期方案中,对6名健康男性志愿者的24小时睡眠模式进行了测量。将睡眠压力估计值(慢波睡眠[SWS]量、慢波活动[SWA]以及同步率[RoS:非快速眼动期开始时SWA的积累率])与体温(Tb24)和睡眠倾向的24小时模式进行了比较。如24小时睡眠水平下降所示,在48小时的研究中产生了中度睡眠债。在第1天,快速眼动睡眠和慢波睡眠的超日节律模式很突出;在第2天,快速眼动睡眠、慢波睡眠、睡眠潜伏期、总睡眠时间和Tb24的昼夜节律模式更为突出。同样在第2天,SWA和RoS呈现双相模式,峰值出现在Tb24的下降和上升阶段。SWA和RoS的双相峰值可能与中度睡眠压力条件下昼夜节律起搏器与睡眠稳态的阶段特异性相互作用有关。需要进一步研究来重复这一发现,并确定可能是SWA中12小时模式基础的生物学因素。