Cirocchi Roberto, Abraha Iosief, Farinella Eriberto, Montedori Alessandro, Sciannameo Francesco
Clinica Chirurgica Generale e d'Urgenza, Azienda Ospedaliera di Terni, Terni, Italy, 05100.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD007511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007511.pub2.
Acute intestinal obstruction is one of the most common surgical emergencies. The small bowel obstruction (SBO) is the site of obstruction in most patients (76%) and adhesions are the most common etiology (65%). Laparoscopy in SBO has no clear role yet as it may have a therapeutic and diagnostic function. In some settings laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted surgery is considered feasible and convenient more than conventional surgery for SBO; however little is known if laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted surgery is more suitable with respect to open surgery for patients with SBO.
The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted surgery is feasible and safe for acute SBO, and whether laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted surgery present advantages compared to open surgery in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes.
We searched for published randomised and prospective controlled clinical trials without language restrictions using the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1950 onwards) and EMBASE (1980 onwards).
Randomised controlled trials and non randomised controlled prospective trials evaluating laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted surgery versus traditional open surgery for acute SBO were considered.
We conducted the review according to the recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Colorectal Group as well, using Review Manager 5 to conduct the review.
No published or unpublished randomised controlled trials or prospective controlled clinical trials comparing laparoscopy with open surgery for patients with SBO were identified.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although data from retrospective clinical controlled trials suggest that laparoscopy seems feasible and better in terms of hospital stay and mortality reduction, high quality randomised controlled trials assessing all clinically relevant outcomes including overall mortality, morbidity, hospital stay and conversion are needed.
急性肠梗阻是最常见的外科急症之一。大多数患者(76%)的梗阻部位在小肠,粘连是最常见的病因(65%)。腹腔镜检查在小肠梗阻中尚未明确其作用,因为它可能具有治疗和诊断功能。在某些情况下,腹腔镜或腹腔镜辅助手术被认为比传统的小肠梗阻手术更可行、更方便;然而,对于小肠梗阻患者,腹腔镜或腹腔镜辅助手术相对于开放手术是否更合适,目前知之甚少。
本系统评价的目的是评估腹腔镜或腹腔镜辅助手术对急性小肠梗阻是否可行且安全,以及腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助手术与开放手术相比在短期和长期结局方面是否具有优势。
我们使用以下电子数据库检索已发表的无语言限制的随机和前瞻性对照临床试验:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(1950年起)和EMBASE(1980年起)。
考虑评估腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助手术与传统开放手术治疗急性小肠梗阻的随机对照试验和非随机对照前瞻性试验。
我们也根据Cochrane协作网和Cochrane结直肠组的建议进行评价,使用Review Manager 5进行评价。
未发现已发表或未发表的比较腹腔镜与开放手术治疗小肠梗阻患者的随机对照试验或前瞻性对照临床试验。
尽管回顾性临床对照试验的数据表明,腹腔镜手术在缩短住院时间和降低死亡率方面似乎是可行的且更好,但仍需要高质量的随机对照试验来评估所有临床相关结局,包括总死亡率、发病率、住院时间和中转率。