Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗小肠梗阻的比较

Laparoscopic versus open surgery in small bowel obstruction.

作者信息

Cirocchi Roberto, Abraha Iosief, Farinella Eriberto, Montedori Alessandro, Sciannameo Francesco

机构信息

Clinica Chirurgica Generale e d'Urgenza, Azienda Ospedaliera di Terni, Terni, Italy, 05100.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD007511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007511.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute intestinal obstruction is one of the most common surgical emergencies. The small bowel obstruction (SBO) is the site of obstruction in most patients (76%) and adhesions are the most common etiology (65%). Laparoscopy in SBO has no clear role yet as it may have a therapeutic and diagnostic function. In some settings laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted surgery is considered feasible and convenient more than conventional surgery for SBO; however little is known if laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted surgery is more suitable with respect to open surgery for patients with SBO.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted surgery is feasible and safe for acute SBO, and whether laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted surgery present advantages compared to open surgery in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for published randomised and prospective controlled clinical trials without language restrictions using the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1950 onwards) and EMBASE (1980 onwards).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and non randomised controlled prospective trials evaluating laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted surgery versus traditional open surgery for acute SBO were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We conducted the review according to the recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Colorectal Group as well, using Review Manager 5 to conduct the review.

MAIN RESULTS

No published or unpublished randomised controlled trials or prospective controlled clinical trials comparing laparoscopy with open surgery for patients with SBO were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although data from retrospective clinical controlled trials suggest that laparoscopy seems feasible and better in terms of hospital stay and mortality reduction, high quality randomised controlled trials assessing all clinically relevant outcomes including overall mortality, morbidity, hospital stay and conversion are needed.

摘要

背景

急性肠梗阻是最常见的外科急症之一。大多数患者(76%)的梗阻部位在小肠,粘连是最常见的病因(65%)。腹腔镜检查在小肠梗阻中尚未明确其作用,因为它可能具有治疗和诊断功能。在某些情况下,腹腔镜或腹腔镜辅助手术被认为比传统的小肠梗阻手术更可行、更方便;然而,对于小肠梗阻患者,腹腔镜或腹腔镜辅助手术相对于开放手术是否更合适,目前知之甚少。

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估腹腔镜或腹腔镜辅助手术对急性小肠梗阻是否可行且安全,以及腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助手术与开放手术相比在短期和长期结局方面是否具有优势。

检索策略

我们使用以下电子数据库检索已发表的无语言限制的随机和前瞻性对照临床试验:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(1950年起)和EMBASE(1980年起)。

选择标准

考虑评估腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助手术与传统开放手术治疗急性小肠梗阻的随机对照试验和非随机对照前瞻性试验。

数据收集与分析

我们也根据Cochrane协作网和Cochrane结直肠组的建议进行评价,使用Review Manager 5进行评价。

主要结果

未发现已发表或未发表的比较腹腔镜与开放手术治疗小肠梗阻患者的随机对照试验或前瞻性对照临床试验。

作者结论

尽管回顾性临床对照试验的数据表明,腹腔镜手术在缩短住院时间和降低死亡率方面似乎是可行的且更好,但仍需要高质量的随机对照试验来评估所有临床相关结局,包括总死亡率、发病率、住院时间和中转率。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open surgery in small bowel obstruction.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗小肠梗阻的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD007511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007511.pub2.
2
Oral traditional Chinese medication for adhesive small bowel obstruction.口服中药治疗粘连性小肠梗阻。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD008836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008836.pub2.
3
Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 25;11(11):CD009277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2.
4
Laparoscopic versus Open surgery for small bowel Crohn's disease.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗小肠克罗恩病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD006956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006956.pub2.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
10
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD011391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2.

引用本文的文献

10
A systematic review of symptomatic hamartomas of the jejunum and ileum.空肠和回肠症状性错构瘤的系统评价。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Jan;104(1):18-23. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0038. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Laparoscopic treatment of complex small bowel obstruction: is it safe?腹腔镜治疗复杂性小肠梗阻:安全吗?
Surg Innov. 2008 Jun;15(2):110-3. doi: 10.1177/1553350608319032. Epub 2008 May 13.
5
The laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction.小肠梗阻的腹腔镜治疗
Am J Surg. 2007 Dec;194(6):882-7; discussion 887-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.025.
9
Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions.腹腔镜粘连松解术。
World J Surg. 2006 Apr;30(4):535-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7778-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验