Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Feb;20(2):240-7. doi: 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181cafb47.
INTRODUCTION: Paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) is generally considered to be the "gold standard" regimen for treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Little data are available, however, on the use of this regimen in patients with clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary (CCC). Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride plus cisplatin has been reported to be effective for primary and recurrent or resistant CCC. We compared these 2 combinations in patients with CCC. METHODS: Patients (n = 99) with CCC were randomly assigned to receive either 180 mg/m2 paclitaxel on day 1 plus AUC 6 mg/mL x minute carboplatin on day 1 every 21 days (TC arm) or 60 mg/m2 irinotecan hydrochloride on days 1, 8, 15 plus 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 every 28 days (CPT-P arm). RESULTS: Percentages of patients receiving the scheduled 6 cycles of chemotherapy in the TC and CPT-P arms were 70.8% and 72.0%, respectively. Although toxicity was well tolerated in both arms, the toxicity profile of each arm differed. Progression-free survival (PFS) showed no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups. Because there were more patients with large residual disease in the CPT-P arm, we performed a subset analysis by removing those patients, and then compared the PFS with that of patients without residual disease or with residual disease less than 2 cm. The PFS tended to be longer in the CPT-P group, although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A phase III randomized trial is required to elucidate the effectiveness of CPT-P combination chemotherapy for CCC.
简介:紫杉醇联合卡铂(TC)通常被认为是治疗上皮性卵巢癌的“金标准”方案。然而,关于该方案在卵巢透明细胞腺癌(CCC)患者中的应用的数据很少。盐酸伊立替康联合顺铂的联合化疗已被报道对原发性和复发性或耐药性 CCC 有效。我们比较了这两种方案在 CCC 患者中的应用。
方法:将 99 例 CCC 患者随机分为 TC 组(180mg/m2 紫杉醇第 1 天+AUC 6mg/mL×min 卡铂第 1 天,每 21 天 1 次)或 CPT-P 组(60mg/m2 盐酸伊立替康第 1、8、15 天+60mg/m2 顺铂第 1 天,每 28 天 1 次)。
结果:TC 组和 CPT-P 组分别有 70.8%和 72.0%的患者接受了计划的 6 个周期化疗。虽然两组的毒性均耐受良好,但毒性谱不同。无进展生存期(PFS)在两组之间无显著差异。由于 CPT-P 组有更多的患者存在大残留病灶,我们通过去除这些患者进行了亚组分析,然后比较了 PFS 与无残留病灶或残留病灶小于 2cm 的患者的 PFS。CPT-P 组的 PFS 有延长趋势,但差异无统计学意义。
结论:需要进行 III 期随机试验来阐明 CPT-P 联合化疗对 CCC 的有效性。
Cancers (Basel). 2021-12-4
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017-5
Cancer Cell Int. 2015-12-15
Oncoscience. 2015-3-23