• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简历造假:泌尿科培训项目申请人的不可验证出版物。

Resume fraud: unverifiable publications of urology training program applicants.

机构信息

Sol and Margaret Berger Department of Urology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.037. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.037
PMID:20171693
Abstract

PURPOSE

We examined the incidence of resume fraud among urology residency applicants by determining the rate of misrepresented publications listed in applications to a urology residency program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Applications from all 147 urology residency applicants to a program from the 2007 application cycle were analyzed. Verification of listed publications was attempted by querying PubMed, Google Scholar and MEDLINE. Univariate analysis was conducted to assess associations between unverifiable publications and applicant demographics.

RESULTS

Of the applicants who submitted publications 19% (14 of 71) had at least 1 unverifiable publication, which represented 9% (14 of 147) of the entire applicant pool. There were no statistically significant associations between misrepresented publications and applicant demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

Applicants had a low but still unacceptable rate of misrepresented publications and this trend in academic medicine is of great concern.

摘要

目的

通过确定泌尿外科住院医师培训计划申请中列出的虚假出版物的比例,来检查泌尿科住院医师申请人简历造假的发生率。

材料和方法

分析了 2007 年申请周期中所有 147 名泌尿科住院医师培训申请人的申请。通过查询 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 MEDLINE 尝试对列出的出版物进行核实。进行单变量分析以评估无法核实的出版物与申请人特征之间的关联。

结果

在提交出版物的申请人中,19%(71 人中的 14 人)至少有 1 篇无法核实的出版物,这代表整个申请人群体的 9%(147 人中的 14 人)。在虚假出版物与申请人特征之间没有统计学上显著的关联。

结论

申请人的虚假出版物比例虽然较低,但仍不可接受,这种学术医学中的趋势令人非常担忧。

相似文献

1
Resume fraud: unverifiable publications of urology training program applicants.简历造假:泌尿科培训项目申请人的不可验证出版物。
J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.037. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
2
"Phantom" publications among plastic surgery residency applicants.整形外科住院医师申请人中的“幽灵”出版物。
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):391-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823d2c4e.
3
Misrepresentation of publications among radiation oncology residency applicants.放射肿瘤学住院医师申请者中出版物的不实陈述。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Apr;3(4):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.12.001.
4
Misrepresentation of research publications among orthopedic surgery fellowship applicants: a comparison with documented misrepresentations in other fields.骨科手术 fellowship 申请人中研究出版物的不实陈述:与其他领域已记录的不实陈述的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 2003 Apr 1;28(7):632-36.
5
"Ghost" publications among applicants to a general surgery residency program.普通外科住院医师培训项目申请者中的“幽灵”出版物。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Oct;207(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
6
Rate of Unverifiable Publications Among Ophthalmology Residency Applicants Invited to Interview.眼科住院医师申请人受邀面试的不可验证出版物比例。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):630-635. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0846.
7
Publication misrepresentation among neurosurgery residency applicants: an increasing problem.神经外科住院医师申请者中的论文造假:一个日益严重的问题。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):193-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141990. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
8
Ghost publications in the pediatric surgery match.小儿外科研文造假。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.031. Epub 2013 May 7.
9
Prevalence and types of misrepresentation of publication record by pathology residency applicants.病理住院医师申请人发表记录造假的流行率和类型。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Jul;137(7):979-82. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0253-OA.
10
Unverifiable publications in otolaryngology residency applications.耳鼻喉科住院医师申请中无法核实的出版物。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Aug;147(2):249-55. doi: 10.1177/0194599812440662. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Trustworthiness in Research: A Pilot Study on CV Verification.评估研究中的可信度:简历验证的初步研究
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Oct;14(4):353-364. doi: 10.1177/1556264619857843. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
2
The surgical trends and time-frame comparison of primary surgery for stress urinary incontinence, 2006-2010 vs 1997-2005: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study.压力性尿失禁初次手术的手术趋势及时间框架比较,2006 - 2010年与1997 - 2005年:一项基于全国人群的随访描述性研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Dec;25(12):1683-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2443-5. Epub 2014 Jun 28.