• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双能减影胸部放射摄影在肋骨骨折检测中的骨图像。

Bone images from dual-energy subtraction chest radiography in the detection of rib fractures.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 4, Bern CH-3010, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.016
PMID:20171819
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the sensitivity and image quality of chest radiography (CXR) with or without dual-energy subtracted (ES) bone images in the detection of rib fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 39 patients with 204 rib fractures and 24 subjects with no fractures were examined with a single exposure dual-energy subtraction digital radiography system. Three blinded readers first evaluated the non-subtracted posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs alone, and 3 months later they evaluated the non-subtracted images together with the subtracted posteroanterior bone images. The locations of rib fractures were registered with confidence levels on a 3-grade scale. Image quality was rated on a 5-point scale. Marks by readers were compared with fracture localizations in CT as a standard of reference.

RESULTS

The sensivity for fracture detection using both methods was very similar (34.3% with standard CXR and 33.5% with ES-CXR, p=0.92). At the patient level, both sensitivity (71.8%) and specificity (92.9%) with or without ES were identical. Diagnostic confidence was not significantly different (2.61 with CXR and 2.75 with ES-CXR, p=0.063). Image quality with ES was rated higher than that on standard CXR (4.08 vs. 3.74, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a better image quality, adding ES bone images to standard radiographs of the chest does not provide better sensitivity or improved diagnostic confidence in the detection of rib fractures.

摘要

目的

评估胸部 X 线摄影(CXR)加或不加双能减影(ES)骨图像在检测肋骨骨折中的敏感性和图像质量。

材料和方法

在这项回顾性研究中,39 例 204 处肋骨骨折患者和 24 例无骨折患者使用单曝光双能减影数字射线摄影系统进行检查。三位盲法读者首先单独评估非减影前后位和侧位胸部 X 线片,3 个月后,他们评估非减影图像和减影前后位骨图像。肋骨骨折的位置用 3 级可信度等级进行标记。图像质量用 5 分制评分。读者的标记与 CT 骨折定位进行比较作为参考标准。

结果

两种方法的骨折检测敏感性非常相似(标准 CXR 为 34.3%,ES-CXR 为 33.5%,p=0.92)。在患者水平,无论是否使用 ES,敏感性(71.8%)和特异性(92.9%)均相同。诊断信心没有显著差异(CXR 为 2.61,ES-CXR 为 2.75,p=0.063)。ES 图像质量评分高于标准 CXR(4.08 对 3.74,p<0.001)。

结论

尽管图像质量更好,但在标准胸部 X 线摄影中添加 ES 骨图像并不能提高检测肋骨骨折的敏感性或诊断信心。

相似文献

1
Bone images from dual-energy subtraction chest radiography in the detection of rib fractures.双能减影胸部放射摄影在肋骨骨折检测中的骨图像。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
2
Computer-Aided Detection of Seven Chest Pathologies on Standard Posteroanterior Chest X-Rays Compared to Radiologists Reading Dual-Energy Subtracted Radiographs.基于标准后前位胸片的计算机辅助检测与放射科医师双能减影胸片阅片诊断七种胸部病变的比较
Acad Radiol. 2022 Aug;29(8):e139-e148. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
3
Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice.单次曝光双能减影胸部X线摄影:临床实践中肺结节和肿块的检测
Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):24-31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0758-z. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
4
[Detectability of rib bone lesions using dual-energy subtraction radiography].
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2009 Jan;34(1):85-9.
5
Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers.利用商业计算机辅助诊断软件提高能量减影胸部 X 线摄影中肺结节的检出率:与人工观察者的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):1289-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1667-0. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
6
Chest radiographs versus CT for the detection of rib fractures in children (DRIFT): a diagnostic accuracy observational study.胸部 X 光片与 CT 对儿童肋骨骨折的检测比较(DRIFT):一项诊断准确性观察研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Nov;2(11):802-811. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30274-8. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
7
CT diagnosis of Rib fractures and the prediction of acute respiratory failure.肋骨骨折的CT诊断及急性呼吸衰竭的预测
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):905-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181668ad7.
8
Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.原型双能胸部成像系统的诊断性能 ROC 分析。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Mar;17(3):298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
9
Comparison of computed tomography and chest radiography in the detection of rib fractures in abused infants.计算机断层扫描与胸部X线摄影在检测受虐婴儿肋骨骨折中的比较。
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jun;32(6):659-63. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.06.011. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
10
[Clinical evaluation of single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: with FCR 9501 ES].
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1996 Nov;56(13):909-16.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of deep learning-based computer aided diagnostic system in improving diagnostic performance of rib fractures in acute blunt trauma.深度学习辅助计算机辅助诊断系统在提高急性钝性创伤性肋骨骨折诊断性能中的价值。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01012-7.
2
Evaluation of the clinical utility of temporal subtraction using bone suppression processing in digital chest radiography.数字胸部X线摄影中使用骨抑制处理的时间减影临床效用评估。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 16;9(1):e13004. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13004. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Comparison of Ultrasonography and Radiography in Detection of Thoracic Bone Fractures; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
超声检查与X线摄影术在检测胸椎骨折中的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Spring;4(2):55-64.
4
Initial assessment of chest X-ray in thoracic trauma patients: Awareness of specific injuries.胸部创伤患者胸部X线的初始评估:对特定损伤的认识
World J Radiol. 2012 Feb 28;4(2):48-52. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i2.48.