Suppr超能文献

应用网胃采样替代真胃采样估测采食青贮日粮奶牛的瘤胃外流。

Estimation of rumen outflow in dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets by use of reticular sampling as an alternative to sampling from the omasal canal.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Aquacultural Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1138-47. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2661.

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare nutrient flows determined by a reticular sampling technique with those made by sampling digesta from the omasal canal. Six lactating dairy cows fitted with ruminal cannulas were used in a design with a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments and 4 periods. Treatments were 3 grass silages differing mainly in neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations: 412, 530, or 639 g/kg of dry matter, each combined with 1 of 2 levels of concentrate feed. Digesta was collected from the reticulum and the omasal canal to represent a 24-h feeding cycle. Nutrient flow was calculated using the reconstitution system based on 3 markers (Co, Yb, and indigestible NDF) and using (15)N as a microbial marker. Large and small particles and the fluid phase were recovered from digesta collected at both sampling sites. Bacterial samples from the reticulum and the omasum were separated into liquid- and particle-associated bacteria. Reticular samples were sieved through a 1-mm sieve before isolation of digesta phases and bacteria. Composition of the large particle phase differed mainly in fiber content of the digesta obtained from the 2 sampling sites. Sampling site did not affect marker concentration in any of the phases with which the markers were primarily associated. The (15)N enrichment of bacterial samples did not differ between sampling sites. The reticular and omasal canal sampling techniques gave similar estimates of marker concentrations in reconstituted digesta, estimates of ruminal flow, and ruminal digestibility values for dry matter, organic matter, starch, and N. Sampling site x diet interactions were also not significant. Concentration of NDF was 2.2% higher in reconstituted omasal digesta than in reconstituted reticular digesta. Ruminal NDF digestibility was 2.7% higher when estimated by sampling the reticulum than by sampling the omasal canal. The higher estimate of ruminal NDF digestibility with the reticular sampling technique was due to differences in NDF concentration of reconstituted digesta. This study shows that nutrient and microbial protein outflow from the rumen can be measured using a reticular sampling technique. The reticular sampling technique provides a promising alternative to sampling from the omasal canal because there is less interference with the animal and it does not require advanced sampling equipment.

摘要

一项研究比较了通过网格取样技术确定的养分流量与从网胃管取样获得的消化物的养分流量。使用具有 3x2 因子处理和 4 个时期的设计,对 6 头安装有瘤胃套管的泌乳奶牛进行了研究。处理是 3 种主要在中性洗涤纤维(NDF)浓度上不同的草青贮料:412、530 或 639g/kg 干物质,分别与 2 个浓缩饲料水平之一结合。从瘤胃和网胃收集消化物以代表 24 小时的进食周期。使用基于 3 种标记物(Co、Yb 和不可消化的 NDF)和(15)N 作为微生物标记物的重组系统计算养分流量。从两个采样点采集的消化物中回收大颗粒和小颗粒以及流体相。从瘤胃和网胃分离细菌样本,并将其分为液体相关和颗粒相关细菌。在分离消化物相和细菌之前,将瘤胃样本通过 1mm 的筛子进行筛选。两个采样点获得的消化物中,大颗粒相的组成主要在纤维含量上有所不同。标记物主要相关的任何相中,采样点均未影响标记物的浓度。细菌样本的(15)N 富集在采样点之间没有差异。网格和网胃管采样技术对重组消化物中标记物浓度、瘤胃流量以及干物质、有机物、淀粉和 N 的瘤胃消化率的估计值相似。采样点 x 饮食的相互作用也不显著。重组网胃消化物中的 NDF 浓度比重组瘤胃消化物高 2.2%。通过采样瘤胃估计瘤胃 NDF 消化率比通过采样网胃高 2.7%。由于重组消化物中 NDF 浓度的差异,瘤胃 NDF 消化率的估计值通过网格采样技术更高。本研究表明,可使用网格采样技术测量瘤胃中养分和微生物蛋白的流出量。与从网胃管取样相比,网格取样技术为动物提供了一种很有前途的替代方法,因为它对动物的干扰较小,而且不需要先进的采样设备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验