Suppr超能文献

先前存在的并发症会影响抢救失败质量指标吗?

Do pre-existing complications affect the failure to rescue quality measures?

作者信息

Moriarty J P, Finnie D M, Johnson M G, Huddleston J M, Naessens J M

机构信息

Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb;19(1):65-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025981.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A project sponsored by the University Health System Consortium has addressed the inaccuracy and high variability across institutions concerning the use of the failure to rescue (FTR) quality indicator defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Results indicated that of the complications identified by the quality indicator, 29.5% were pre-existing upon hospital admission.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to investigate the possible bias to FTR measures by including cases of complications that were pre-existing at admission.

METHODS

Hospital discharges between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2007 were retrospectively gathered from administrative databases. Using definitions outlined by the AHRQ and the National Quality Forum (NQF), FTR rates were calculated. Using present on admission coding, FTR rates were recalculated to differentiate between the rates of pre-existing and that of acquired cases.

RESULTS

Using the AHRQ definition, the overall FTR rate was 11.60%. The FTR rate for patients with pre-existing complications was 8.85%, whereas patients with complications acquired during hospitalisation had an FTR rate of 18.46% (p<0.001). The NQF FTR rate was 9.93%. Pre-existing and acquired FTR rates using the NQF measure were 9.42% and 12.77%, respectively (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current definitions of FTR measures meant to identify inhospital complications appear biased by the inclusion of problems at admission. Furthermore, many patients with these complications are excluded from the algorithms. When taking into account the timing of the "complications", these measures can be useful for internal quality control. However, it should be stressed that the usefulness of the measures to compare institutions will be dependent on coding practices of institutions. Validation using chart review may be required.

摘要

背景

由大学卫生系统联盟赞助的一个项目解决了各机构在使用医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)定义的未能挽救(FTR)质量指标方面存在的不准确和高变异性问题。结果表明,在质量指标所确定的并发症中,29.5%在入院时就已存在。

目的

我们研究的目的是调查纳入入院时就已存在的并发症病例对FTR测量可能产生的偏差。

方法

从行政数据库中回顾性收集1996年1月1日至2007年9月30日期间的医院出院数据。使用AHRQ和国家质量论坛(NQF)概述的定义计算FTR率。使用入院时存在编码,重新计算FTR率以区分已存在病例和获得性病例的发生率。

结果

使用AHRQ定义,总体FTR率为11.60%。入院时就已存在并发症的患者的FTR率为8.85%,而住院期间获得并发症的患者的FTR率为18.46%(p<0.001)。NQF的FTR率为9.93%。使用NQF测量方法,已存在和获得性FTR率分别为9.42%和12.77%(p<0.001)。

结论

旨在识别住院并发症的FTR测量的当前定义似乎因纳入入院时的问题而存在偏差。此外,许多有这些并发症的患者被排除在算法之外。考虑到“并发症”的发生时间,这些测量对于内部质量控制可能是有用的。然而,应该强调的是,这些测量对于比较各机构的有用性将取决于各机构的编码实践。可能需要使用病历审查进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验