University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1126-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d56fae.
Reports of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome have generally been restricted to mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients, creating an incomplete picture of the epidemiologies of the syndromes. We sought to determine the incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndromes throughout an entire hospital population.
Retrospective cohort study.
A Department of Veterans Affairs medical center.
All patients satisfying criteria for acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome during a 2-yr period.
None.
There were 11,465 acute medical and surgical admissions during the study period; 156 patients had acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Only 74 (47%) were invasively ventilated in an intensive care unit for acute lung injury. Another 15 (10%) patients were ventilated for other reasons, 41 (26%) were admitted to an intensive care unit at approximately the time of acute lung injury onset but were not invasively ventilated, and 26 (17%) were managed with neither invasive ventilation nor admission to an intensive care unit. Four-week mortality differed by group (p = .023), ranging from 22% among those managed in an intensive care unit without invasive ventilation to 50% among those ventilated for acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. By 2 yrs, differences in survival between groups were no longer significant. Notably, only 53 (34%) patients would have been eligible for widely cited acute lung injury intervention trials. Ten patients had a second episode of acute lung injury during the study period, equating to a 16%-per-year risk of recurrence.
Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome studies restricted to patients mechanically ventilated in intensive care units substantially underestimate the incidence of the syndromes. Nonventilated patients and those cared for outside of intensive care units may still be at substantial risk for death. Further characterization of previously overlooked acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome patients may suggest new therapeutic opportunities.
急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的报告通常仅限于机械通气的重症监护病房患者,这使得这些综合征的流行病学情况并不完整。我们试图确定整个医院人群中急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的发病率和结局。
回顾性队列研究。
退伍军人事务部医疗中心。
在 2 年期间符合急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征标准的所有患者。
无。
研究期间共有 11465 例急性内科和外科住院患者;156 例患者患有急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征。仅有 74 例(47%)因急性肺损伤在重症监护室进行有创通气。另有 15 例(10%)患者因其他原因进行通气,41 例(26%)在急性肺损伤发作时入住重症监护室但未进行有创通气,26 例(17%)未进行有创通气或入住重症监护室。4 周死亡率因组而异(p =.023),从未进行有创通气的重症监护室管理组的 22%到急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征通气组的 50%不等。2 年后,各组之间的生存率差异不再显著。值得注意的是,只有 53 例(34%)患者符合广泛引用的急性肺损伤干预试验标准。研究期间,有 10 例患者发生第二次急性肺损伤,每年复发风险为 16%。
将研究仅限于重症监护病房机械通气的患者的急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征研究极大地低估了这些综合征的发病率。未通气的患者和在重症监护室之外接受治疗的患者仍可能面临巨大的死亡风险。对以前被忽视的急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的进一步描述可能会提供新的治疗机会。