• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府陷入瘫痪?稳定的烟草价格意味着可预防的死亡和疾病持续存在,新西兰的健康不平等现象也依然存在。

Government paralysis? Stable tobacco prices mean preventable deaths and disease persist, along with health inequalities in New Zealand.

作者信息

Thomson George, O'Dea Des, Wilson Nick, Edwards Richard

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Box 7343 Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2010 Jan 23;123(1308):74-80.

PMID:20173798
Abstract

Tobacco affordability, prices and tobacco tax rates have considerable effects on smoking uptake, consumption, and quitting. We examined the trends in New Zealand per capita tobacco consumption and real cigarette prices from 1975-2008. Since 1984, there has been a close inverse relationship between real price and per capita tobacco consumption. Thus price increases drive consumption falls. However, in the periods of 1992-1997 and 2002-2008, both price and consumption were largely stable. The stability since 2002 means other tobacco control interventions have been undercut by increased tobacco affordability (due to increased average real incomes). Furthermore, the lack of tobacco tax increases (to be used to fund better tobacco control) is against majority surveyed New Zealand public opinion, and may be contrary to even smokers' views. The great majority of smokers, who want to quit, could be assisted by more extensive programmes funded by the extra revenue from tobacco tax increases. These could include more prime-time mass media campaigns and greater Quitline capacity. Tobacco tax increases are a highly evidence-based policy that could help reduce harm to the health of New Zealanders and reduce health inequalities.

摘要

烟草的可承受性、价格和烟草税率对吸烟行为的开始、消费以及戒烟有着重大影响。我们研究了1975年至2008年新西兰人均烟草消费和实际香烟价格的趋势。自1984年以来,实际价格与人均烟草消费之间存在密切的负相关关系。因此,价格上涨促使消费下降。然而,在1992年至1997年以及2002年至2008年期间,价格和消费在很大程度上保持稳定。2002年以来的这种稳定性意味着,其他烟草控制干预措施因烟草可承受性提高(由于平均实际收入增加)而受到削弱。此外,缺乏烟草税上调(用于资助更好的烟草控制)与大多数接受调查的新西兰公众意见相悖,甚至可能与吸烟者的观点也不一致。绝大多数想要戒烟的吸烟者可以通过由烟草税上调带来的额外收入资助的更广泛项目得到帮助。这些项目可以包括更多的黄金时段大众媒体宣传活动以及扩大戒烟热线的服务能力。提高烟草税是一项有充分证据支持的政策,有助于减少对新西兰人健康的危害并减少健康不平等现象。

相似文献

1
Government paralysis? Stable tobacco prices mean preventable deaths and disease persist, along with health inequalities in New Zealand.政府陷入瘫痪?稳定的烟草价格意味着可预防的死亡和疾病持续存在,新西兰的健康不平等现象也依然存在。
N Z Med J. 2010 Jan 23;123(1308):74-80.
2
Tobacco tax as a health protecting policy: a brief review of the New Zealand evidence.烟草税作为一项健康保护政策:对新西兰相关证据的简要综述。
N Z Med J. 2005 Apr 15;118(1213):U1403.
3
Characteristics of smoker support for increasing a dedicated tobacco tax: national survey data from New Zealand.支持提高专用烟草税的吸烟者特征:来自新西兰的全国调查数据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Feb;12(2):168-73. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp178. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
4
Snuffing out cigarette sales and the smoking deaths epidemic.杜绝香烟销售与吸烟致死的流行趋势。
N Z Med J. 2007 Jun 15;120(1256):U2587.
5
Economic and public health impact of 2007-2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine.2007-2010 年乌克兰提高烟草税的经济和公共卫生影响。
Tob Control. 2012 Jul;21(4):429-35. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.040071. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
6
Demand analysis of tobacco consumption in Malaysia.马来西亚烟草消费需求分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Nov;9(11):1163-9. doi: 10.1080/14622200701648433.
7
A simulation model to predict the fiscal and public health impact of a change in cigarette excise taxes.一种用于预测香烟消费税变化对财政和公共卫生影响的仿真模型。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):31-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.028779. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
Support for a tobacco endgame and increased regulation of the tobacco industry among New Zealand smokers: results from a National Survey.支持烟草业终结并加强对烟草业的监管:来自全国调查的新西兰烟民观点。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e86-93. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
Use of four major tobacco control interventions in New Zealand: a review.新西兰四大烟草控制干预措施的应用:一项综述。
N Z Med J. 2008 Jun 20;121(1276):71-86.
10
What is tobacco tax for--revenue or health?烟草税的用途是什么——为了财政收入还是为了健康?
N Z Med J. 2012 Sep 21;125(1362):110-1.