Suppr超能文献

比较不同抗血小板治疗方案对跛行患者的疗效。一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of efficacy of antiplatelet treatments for patients with claudication. A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Internal Medicine Division-Atherothrombosis Centre and BioMedical Statistics and Clinical Epidemiology Centre, Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza Universityof Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2010 Apr;103(4):766-73. doi: 10.1160/TH09-09-0635. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

Abstract

It was the aim of the present study to investigate if antiplatelet treatment reduced cardiovascular events in patients with claudication and/or an ankle/brachial index (ABI)< or =0.99 and to analyse if specific antiplatelet treatment had a different impact on clinical outcome. We performed a meta-analysis of 29 clinical randomized trials on antiplatelet therapy for prevention of vascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in 10,735 peripheral artery disease patients. The primary end-point utilizing in the meta-analysis construction was Cardiovascular Adverse Event. We found 1,900 (17.70%) patients in trials with aspirin, 5,326 (49.61%) in those with thienopyridines, 2,324 (21.65%) in those with picotamide and 1,185 (11.04 %) in those with others antiplatelet drugs. A statistically significant effect of antiplatelet treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.839; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.729-0.965; p=0.014] was observed. There was a statistically significant reduction of clinical outcome [OR 0.779; 95% CI 0.639-0.950; p=0.014] in the thienopyridine-treated group vs. control. Patients treated with picotamide [OR 0.785; 95% CI 0.495-1.243; p=0.302] or aspirin [OR 0.847; 95%CI 0.653-1.097; p=0.084] showed reduced cardiovascular outcomes, that, however, did not reach significance. The study confirms that antiplatelet treatment reduces vascular outcome in claudicants. Significant reduction was observed with thienopyridines while data regarding aspirin and picotamide were inconclusive.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨抗血小板治疗是否能减少跛行和/或踝臂指数(ABI)<或=0.99 的患者的心血管事件,并分析特定的抗血小板治疗对临床结局是否有不同的影响。我们对 29 项关于抗血小板治疗预防血管死亡、心肌梗死和中风的临床随机试验进行了荟萃分析,共纳入 10735 例外周动脉疾病患者。荟萃分析构建中使用的主要终点是心血管不良事件。我们发现,1900 例(17.70%)患者使用阿司匹林,5326 例(49.61%)患者使用噻吩吡啶类药物,2324 例(21.65%)患者使用 picotamide,1185 例(11.04%)患者使用其他抗血小板药物。抗血小板治疗具有统计学显著的效果[比值比(OR)0.839;95%置信区间(CI)0.729-0.965;p=0.014]。噻吩吡啶治疗组与对照组相比,临床结局有统计学显著降低[OR 0.779;95%CI 0.639-0.950;p=0.014]。picotamide [OR 0.785;95%CI 0.495-1.243;p=0.302]或阿司匹林[OR 0.847;95%CI 0.653-1.097;p=0.084]治疗的患者心血管结局也有所降低,但未达到统计学意义。本研究证实,抗血小板治疗可降低跛行患者的血管结局。噻吩吡啶类药物显著降低了血管结局,而阿司匹林和 picotamide 的数据则不确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验