Department of Surgery, Division of General Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, University of Minnesota, MMC 207, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;139(3):578-82; discussion 582-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.017.
The objectives of our study are to (1) describe our experience with endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes and (2) illustrate how thoracic surgeons facile with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration have the potential to streamline patient care.
We performed a retrospective review of all patients within our prospectively maintained database who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes by thoracic surgeons at the University of Minnesota from September 1, 2006, to April 15, 2009. We included patients in our analysis if (1) their malignancy diagnosis was based on immediate endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology or (2) they underwent a confirmatory procedure (ie, mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy) that sampled the same mediastinal lymph node stations biopsied by endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to verify normal, benign, or nondiagnostic endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration findings. We also collected data on additional diagnostic or therapeutic procedures performed in the same anesthesia setting as endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Over the study period, 192 patients underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; 98 patients met our inclusion criteria. We achieved a sensitivity of 87.9%, specificity of 97.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 91.7%. For patients undergoing lung cancer staging, we sampled a mean of 3.0 +/- 0.9 mediastinal lymph node stations. Half of our patients underwent an additional diagnostic or therapeutic procedure at the time of endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
Thoracic surgeons who perform endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration can achieve excellent sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy while adhering to sound oncologic principles. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adds to the thoracic surgeon's unique capacity to expedite a diagnostic workup and treatment, thereby streamlining patient care.
我们研究的目的是:(1) 描述我们在经支气管超声引导下细针抽吸纵隔淋巴结方面的经验;(2) 说明对超声引导下细针抽吸术熟练的胸外科医生如何有可能简化患者的护理。
我们对 2006 年 9 月 1 日至 2009 年 4 月 15 日期间在明尼苏达大学由胸外科医生进行的经支气管超声引导下细针抽吸纵隔淋巴结的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。如果患者的恶性肿瘤诊断基于支气管超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查,或者患者接受了同样的纵隔淋巴结活检的确认程序(即纵隔镜或胸腔镜),则纳入我们的分析。通过支气管超声引导下细针抽吸活检确认正常、良性或非诊断性支气管超声引导下细针抽吸活检结果。我们还收集了在与支气管超声引导下细针抽吸相同的麻醉环境下进行的其他诊断或治疗程序的数据。
在研究期间,有 192 名患者接受了经支气管超声引导下细针抽吸术,其中 98 名患者符合我们的纳入标准。我们的敏感性为 87.9%,特异性为 97.4%,诊断准确性为 91.7%。对于接受肺癌分期的患者,我们平均取样了 3.0±0.9 个纵隔淋巴结站。我们的一半患者在接受支气管超声引导下细针抽吸术的同时接受了额外的诊断或治疗程序。
进行经支气管超声引导下细针抽吸术的胸外科医生可以在遵循肿瘤学原则的前提下,获得优异的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。经支气管超声引导下细针抽吸术增加了胸外科医生加快诊断和治疗的独特能力,从而简化了患者的护理。