Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul/Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Aug;47(8):939-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
Despite recent technical improvements and device developments, post-percutaneous coronary intervention care in patients submitted to this procedure performed through the femoral approach remains almost unchanged. An earlier sheath removal and ambulation could help to cut costs, save health system resources and prevent patient discomfort. However, this approach has not yet been well assessed.
The main objective of this paper was to evaluate a strategy of post-procedure immediate sheath removal and early ambulation.
A randomised trial was conducted in 347 patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention that used a 6 French gauge arterial sheath. The intervention group (IG, n=172) had the arterial sheath removed immediately after the procedure and ambulated after 3 h of bed rest. The control group (CG, n=175) had the arterial sheath removed 4h after the end of the angioplasty and rested for an additional 6 h. The primary end point was the development of major vascular complications: hematoma>10 cm, pseudo-aneurism and arterial bleeding after or during ambulation. Secondary end points were minor vascular complications: hematoma<10 cm, vasovagal reactions after sheath removal, and assessment of patient's comfort during the peri-operative period.
Baseline characteristics did not differ statistically between groups, as major bleeding (IG=1.7% vs. CG=0.6%; p=0.31). Regarding other vascular complications and vasovagal reactions, there were also no significant differences. Patients of IG had less pain (26% vs. 41%, p=0.004) than CG, but the frequency of urinary retention was the same in both groups.
This study, although underpowered, indicates that immediate arterial sheath removal with early ambulation after PCI was not significantly associated with an increase in major vascular complications and was associated with increased patient comfort. Although further studies with larger samples are necessary to confirm these results, this study suggests that immediate arterial sheath removal with early ambulation may be an alternative for selected elective patients submitted to percutaneous coronary interventions and for those with difficulties to endure prolonged bed rest.
尽管最近在技术和器械方面取得了进步,但通过股动脉入路进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者,其术后护理几乎没有改变。更早地移除鞘管并尽早下地活动有助于降低成本、节约医疗系统资源并减少患者不适。然而,这种方法尚未得到充分评估。
本文的主要目的是评估 PCI 术后即刻移除鞘管和早期下床活动的策略。
对 347 例行 6Fr 动脉鞘管介入治疗的患者进行了一项随机试验。干预组(IG,n=172)在术后即刻移除动脉鞘管,并在卧床休息 3 小时后下地活动。对照组(CG,n=175)在经皮冠状动脉成形术结束后 4 小时移除动脉鞘管,并再卧床休息 6 小时。主要终点是发生主要血管并发症:血肿>10cm、假性动脉瘤和在活动期间或之后的动脉出血。次要终点是次要血管并发症:血肿<10cm、鞘管移除后发生血管迷走神经反射,以及围手术期患者舒适度评估。
两组患者的基线特征无统计学差异,主要出血(IG=1.7% vs. CG=0.6%;p=0.31)。其他血管并发症和血管迷走神经反射也无显著差异。IG 组患者疼痛程度较轻(26% vs. 41%,p=0.004),但两组患者的尿潴留发生率相同。
尽管本研究样本量较小,但结果表明,PCI 术后即刻移除动脉鞘管并早期下床活动与主要血管并发症的增加无显著相关性,且与患者舒适度的提高相关。尽管需要更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这些结果,但本研究表明,对于选择性接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,以及对于难以耐受长时间卧床休息的患者,即刻移除动脉鞘管并早期下床活动可能是一种替代选择。