Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Rm A100, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
J Biomech. 2010 May 7;43(7):1351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
Computational models may have the ability to quantify the relationship between hip morphology, cartilage mechanics and osteoarthritis. Most models have assumed the hip joint to be a perfect ball and socket joint and have neglected deformation at the bone-cartilage interface. The objective of this study was to analyze finite element (FE) models of hip cartilage mechanics with varying degrees of simplified geometry and a model with a rigid bone material assumption to elucidate the effects on predictions of cartilage stress. A previously validated subject-specific FE model of a cadaveric hip joint was used as the basis for the models. Geometry for the bone-cartilage interface was either: (1) subject-specific (i.e. irregular), (2) spherical, or (3) a rotational conchoid. Cartilage was assigned either a varying (irregular) or constant thickness (smoothed). Loading conditions simulated walking, stair-climbing and descending stairs. FE predictions of contact stress for the simplified models were compared with predictions from the subject-specific model. Both spheres and conchoids provided a good approximation of native hip joint geometry (average fitting error approximately 0.5mm). However, models with spherical/conchoid bone geometry and smoothed articulating cartilage surfaces grossly underestimated peak and average contact pressures (50% and 25% lower, respectively) and overestimated contact area when compared to the subject-specific FE model. Models incorporating subject-specific bone geometry with smoothed articulating cartilage also underestimated pressures and predicted evenly distributed patterns of contact. The model with rigid bones predicted much higher pressures than the subject-specific model with deformable bones. The results demonstrate that simplifications to the geometry of the bone-cartilage interface, cartilage surface and bone material properties can have a dramatic effect on the predicted magnitude and distribution of cartilage contact pressures in the hip joint.
计算模型可能具有量化髋关节形态、软骨力学和骨关节炎之间关系的能力。大多数模型都假设髋关节为完美的球窝关节,并忽略了骨软骨界面的变形。本研究的目的是分析具有不同简化几何形状的髋关节软骨力学有限元(FE)模型和具有刚性骨材料假设的模型,以阐明这些模型对软骨应力预测的影响。以前验证过的尸体髋关节的特定于主题的 FE 模型被用作模型的基础。骨软骨界面的几何形状为:(1)特定于主题(即不规则),(2)球形,或(3)旋转圆锥曲线。软骨的厚度要么是变化的(不规则的),要么是恒定的(平滑的)。模拟行走、爬楼梯和下楼梯的加载条件。简化模型的接触应力的 FE 预测与特定于主题的模型的预测进行了比较。球体和圆锥曲线都很好地近似了自然髋关节的几何形状(平均拟合误差约为 0.5mm)。然而,具有球形/圆锥曲线骨骼几何形状和平滑关节软骨表面的模型严重低估了峰值和平均接触压力(分别低 50%和 25%),并且与特定于主题的 FE 模型相比高估了接触面积。将特定于主题的骨骼几何形状与平滑关节软骨结合使用的模型也低估了压力,并预测了接触的均匀分布模式。具有刚性骨骼的模型预测的压力远高于具有可变形骨骼的特定于主题的模型。结果表明,骨软骨界面、软骨表面和骨骼材料特性的几何简化对髋关节软骨接触压力的预测幅度和分布有很大影响。