表面流和地下流人工湿地处理奶牛废水中的温室气体排放。

Greenhouse gas emissions from surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating dairy wastewater.

机构信息

Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie Univ., Halifax, NS, Canada B3J 2X4.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2010 Feb 19;39(2):460-71. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0166. Print 2010 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Agricultural wastewater treatment is important for protecting water quality in rural ecosystems, and constructed wetlands are an effective treatment option. During treatment, however, some C and N are converted to CH(4), N(2)O, respectively, which are potent greenhouse gases (GHGs). The objective of this study was to assess CH(4), N(2)O, and CO(2) emissions from surface flow (SF) and subsurface flow (SSF) constructed wetlands. Six constructed wetlands (three SF and three SSF; 6.6 m(2) each) were loaded with dairy wastewater in Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada. From August 2005 through September 2006, GHG fluxes were measured continuously using transparent steady-state chambers that encompassed the entire wetlands. Flux densities of all gases were significantly (p < 0.01) different between SF and SSF wetlands changed significantly with time. Overall, SF wetlands had significantly (p < 0.01) higher emissions of CH(4) N(2)O than SSF wetlands and therefore had 180% higher total GHG emissions. The ratio of N(2)O to CH(4) emissions (CO(2)-equivalent) was nearly 1:1 in both wetland types. Emissions of CH(4)-C as a percentage of C removal varied seasonally from 0.2 to 27% were 2 to 3x higher in SF than SSF wetlands. The ratio of N(2)O-N emitted to N removed was between 0.1 and 1.6%, and the difference between wetland types was inconsistent. Thus, N(2)O emissions had a similar contribution to N removal in both wetland types, but SSF wetlands emitted less CH(4) while removing more C from the wastewater than SF wetlands.

摘要

农业废水处理对于保护农村生态系统的水质非常重要,而人工湿地是一种有效的处理方法。然而,在处理过程中,一些 C 和 N 分别转化为 CH(4)、N(2)O,它们都是强温室气体(GHGs)。本研究的目的是评估表面流(SF)和地下流(SSF)人工湿地中的 CH(4)、N(2)O 和 CO(2)排放。在加拿大新斯科舍省特鲁罗,六个人工湿地(三个 SF 和三个 SSF;每个湿地 6.6 m(2))用奶牛废水进行加载。从 2005 年 8 月到 2006 年 9 月,使用透明稳态室连续测量 GHG 通量,该稳态室涵盖整个湿地。所有气体的通量密度在 SF 和 SSF 湿地之间均有显著差异(p < 0.01),且随时间显著变化。总体而言,SF 湿地的 CH(4)、N(2)O 排放显著高于 SSF 湿地,因此总 GHG 排放高出 180%。两种湿地类型的 N(2)O 与 CH(4)排放比(CO(2)-当量)接近 1:1。CH(4)-C 作为 C 去除量的百分比随季节变化从 0.2%到 27%不等,在 SF 湿地中比 SSF 湿地高 2 到 3 倍。排放的 N(2)O-N 与去除的 N 之比在 0.1%到 1.6%之间,湿地类型之间的差异不一致。因此,N(2)O 排放对两种湿地类型的 N 去除都有相似的贡献,但 SSF 湿地从废水中去除的 C 比 SF 湿地多,而 CH(4)排放较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索